The effects of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) in comparison to a multimodal treatment concept in patients with non-specific chronic back pain-A prospective clinical intervention study

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 21;15(8):e0236780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236780. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Background: According to present guidelines, active exercise is one key component in the comprehensive treatment of nonspecific chronic back pain (NSCBP). Whole body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) is a safe, and time-effective training method, that may be effective in NSCBP-patients.

Methods: In this prospective and controlled nonrandomized clinical study, two therapeutic approaches were compared. One group received 20 minutes WB-EMS per week. An active control group (ACG) received a multimodal therapy program. A third group included subjects without back pain. To all groups, the following measurement instruments were applied: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), North American Spine Society Instrument (NASS); SF 36 survey and measurements for muscular function and postural stability. In the EMS-group: T0: baseline; T1: at 6 weeks; T2: at 12 weeks and T3: at 24 weeks. In the ACG: T0 baseline and T1 after 4 weeks.

Results: In the intervention group, 128 patients with low back pain were enrolled, 85 in the WB-EMS group and 43 in the ACG. 34 subjects were allocated to the passive control group. The average age was 58.6 years (18-86 years). In the EMS group, the NRS (1-10) improved statistically and clinically significantly by 2 points. The ODI was reduced by 19.7 points. The NASS and most of the SF 36 items improved significantly. In the multimodal treatment group, only the muscular function improved slightly.

Conclusion: Our data support the hypothesis that WB-EMS is at least as effective as a multimodal treatment, which is often referred to as being the golden standard. Therefore WB-EMS may be an effective and, with 20 min./week training time, very time-efficient alternative to established multimodal treatment models.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Back Pain / physiopathology
  • Back Pain / therapy*
  • Chronic Disease
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Movement
  • Prospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding

The study was financial supported by miha bodytec GmbH, Siemensstr. 1, D-86368 Gersthofen (Germany). With this support staff costs and administrative expenses of the university were founded. This was an investigator-initiated study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.