Use of Different Cooling Methods in Pig Facilities to Alleviate the Effects of Heat Stress-A Review
- PMID: 32825297
- PMCID: PMC7552673
- DOI: 10.3390/ani10091459
Use of Different Cooling Methods in Pig Facilities to Alleviate the Effects of Heat Stress-A Review
Abstract
An increase in the frequency of hot periods, which has been observed over the past decades, determines the novel approach to livestock facilities improvement. The effects of heat stress are revealed in disorders in physiological processes, impaired immunity, changes in behaviour and decreases in animal production, thus implementation of cooling technologies is a key factor for alleviating these negative consequences. In pig facilities, various cooling methods have been implemented. Air temperature may be decreased by using adiabatic cooling technology such as a high-pressure fogging system or evaporative pads. In modern-type buildings large-surface evaporative pads may support a tunnel ventilation system. Currently a lot of attention has also been paid to developing energy- and water-saving cooling methods, using for example an earth-air or earth-to-water heat exchanger. The pigs' skin surface may be cooled by using sprinkling nozzles, high-velocity air stream or conductive cooling pads. The effectiveness of these technologies is discussed in this article, taking into consideration the indicators of animal welfare such as respiratory rate, skin surface and body core temperature, performance parameters and behavioural changes.
Keywords: cooling; heat stress; physiological indicators; pigs; welfare.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Sprinkler Technology Improves Broiler Production Sustainability: From Stress Alleviation to Water Usage Conservation: A Mini Review.Front Vet Sci. 2020 Sep 22;7:544814. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.544814. eCollection 2020. Front Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 33195519 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaporative tunnel cooling of dairy cows in the southeast. II: impact on lactation performance.J Dairy Sci. 2006 Oct;89(10):3915-23. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72434-1. J Dairy Sci. 2006. PMID: 16960067
-
Evaporative tunnel cooling of dairy cows in the southeast. I: effect on body temperature and respiration rate.J Dairy Sci. 2006 Oct;89(10):3904-14. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72433-X. J Dairy Sci. 2006. PMID: 16960066
-
Extending the potential of evaporative cooling for heat-stress relief.J Dairy Sci. 2006 Oct;89(10):3817-25. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72423-7. J Dairy Sci. 2006. PMID: 16960056
-
Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle.J Dairy Sci. 2003 Jun;86(6):2131-44. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73803-X. J Dairy Sci. 2003. PMID: 12836950 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of evaporative cooling systems on the performance of lactating sows in a tropical climate.Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024 Jan 23;56(2):54. doi: 10.1007/s11250-024-03891-6. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024. PMID: 38261022
-
Hotspots and bottlenecks for the enhancement of the environmental sustainability of pig systems, with emphasis on European pig systems.Porcine Health Manag. 2023 Nov 16;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00347-5. Porcine Health Manag. 2023. PMID: 37974286 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reducing Stocking Densities and Using Cooling Systems for More Adapted Pigs to High Temperatures When Reared in Intensive Conditions.Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 27;13(15):2424. doi: 10.3390/ani13152424. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37570232 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the effect of the indoor environment on the physiological responses of early-gestation sows in a commercial house in China.Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jun 1;10:1178970. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1178970. eCollection 2023. Front Vet Sci. 2023. PMID: 37332739 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of different sow lactation feeder types and drip cooling on sow bodyweight, litter performance, and feeder cleaning criteria.Transl Anim Sci. 2023 Apr 24;7(1):txad040. doi: 10.1093/tas/txad040. eCollection 2023 Jan. Transl Anim Sci. 2023. PMID: 37250346 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Angrecka S., Herbut P. Eligibility of lying boxes at different THI levels in a free stall barn. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2017;17:257–269. doi: 10.1515/aoas-2016-0053. - DOI
-
- Vitt R., Weber L., Zollitsch W., Hörtenhuber S.J., Baumgartner J., Niebuhr K., Piringer M., Anders I., Andre K., Hennig-Pauka I., et al. Modelled performance of energy saving air treatment devices to mitigate heat stress for confined livestock buildings in Central Europe. Biosyst. Eng. 2017;164:85–97. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.09.013. - DOI
-
- Stender D.R., Harmon J.D., Weiss J.D., Cox D. Comparison of different styles of swine finishing facilities within a uniform production system. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2003;19:79–82. doi: 10.13031/2013.12734. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
