Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug 20;10(9):1459.
doi: 10.3390/ani10091459.

Use of Different Cooling Methods in Pig Facilities to Alleviate the Effects of Heat Stress-A Review

Affiliations
Review

Use of Different Cooling Methods in Pig Facilities to Alleviate the Effects of Heat Stress-A Review

Dorota Godyń et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

An increase in the frequency of hot periods, which has been observed over the past decades, determines the novel approach to livestock facilities improvement. The effects of heat stress are revealed in disorders in physiological processes, impaired immunity, changes in behaviour and decreases in animal production, thus implementation of cooling technologies is a key factor for alleviating these negative consequences. In pig facilities, various cooling methods have been implemented. Air temperature may be decreased by using adiabatic cooling technology such as a high-pressure fogging system or evaporative pads. In modern-type buildings large-surface evaporative pads may support a tunnel ventilation system. Currently a lot of attention has also been paid to developing energy- and water-saving cooling methods, using for example an earth-air or earth-to-water heat exchanger. The pigs' skin surface may be cooled by using sprinkling nozzles, high-velocity air stream or conductive cooling pads. The effectiveness of these technologies is discussed in this article, taking into consideration the indicators of animal welfare such as respiratory rate, skin surface and body core temperature, performance parameters and behavioural changes.

Keywords: cooling; heat stress; physiological indicators; pigs; welfare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hahn G.L. Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. J. Anim. Sci. 1999;77(Suppl. 2):10. doi: 10.2527/1997.77suppl_210x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mader T.L., Davis M.S., Brown-Brandl T. Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2006;84:712–719. doi: 10.2527/2006.843712x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angrecka S., Herbut P. Eligibility of lying boxes at different THI levels in a free stall barn. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2017;17:257–269. doi: 10.1515/aoas-2016-0053. - DOI
    1. Vitt R., Weber L., Zollitsch W., Hörtenhuber S.J., Baumgartner J., Niebuhr K., Piringer M., Anders I., Andre K., Hennig-Pauka I., et al. Modelled performance of energy saving air treatment devices to mitigate heat stress for confined livestock buildings in Central Europe. Biosyst. Eng. 2017;164:85–97. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.09.013. - DOI
    1. Stender D.R., Harmon J.D., Weiss J.D., Cox D. Comparison of different styles of swine finishing facilities within a uniform production system. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2003;19:79–82. doi: 10.13031/2013.12734. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources