Linking the effect of psoriatic arthritis-related foot involvement to the Leeds Foot Impact Scale using the International Classification for Functioning, Disability and Health: a study to assess content validity

J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Aug 24;13(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00420-0.

Abstract

Background: Previous research to describe the impact of foot involvement in psoriatic arthritis has used the Leeds Foot Impact Scale in Rheumatoid Arthritis (LFIS-RA) in the current absence of any psoriatic arthritis foot-specific tools. However, the LFIS-RA is a rheumatoid arthritis disease-specific outcome measure and its content validity for evaluating the experiences of people with psoriatic arthritis-related foot involvement is unknown. The study objective was to determine the content validity of the LFIS-RA for assessing people with psoriatic arthritis, using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as the frame of reference.

Method: Concepts within each item of the LFIS-RA were linked to the best-matched ICF categories using established linking rules, which enable a systematic and standardised linking process. All concepts were independently linked to the ICF by 2 investigators with different professional backgrounds, which included occupational therapy and podiatry. The list of ICF categories derived from previous research that pertained to the foot in psoriatic arthritis was then compared with the ICF categories linked to the LFIS-RA. The comparison was undertaken in order to determine the extent to which concepts important and relevant to people with psoriatic arthritis-related foot involvement were addressed.

Results: Thirty-five distinct ICF categories were linked to the LFIS-RA, which related to body functions (44%), activities and participation (35%), environmental factors (16%) and body structure (5%). In comparison with the ICF categories derived from concepts of the foot in psoriatic arthritis previously defined, the LFIS-RA provided coverage of key constructs including pain, functioning, daily activities, footwear restrictions and psychological impact. Other concepts of importance in psoriatic arthritis such as skin and toenail involvement, self-management and paid employment were not addressed in the LFIS-RA.

Conclusion: Content validity of the LFIS-RA to determine the impact of foot functional impairments and disability in people with psoriatic arthritis was not supported by the results of this study. Future work should consider the development of a psoriatic arthritis foot-specific patient reported outcome measure, using the LFIS-RA as an important foundation.

Keywords: Disability and health; Foot; International classification for functioning; Patient reported outcome measures; Psoriatic arthritis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living / psychology
  • Adult
  • Arthritis, Psoriatic / classification*
  • Arthritis, Psoriatic / physiopathology*
  • Arthritis, Psoriatic / psychology
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / complications*
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / diagnosis
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / physiopathology
  • Body Constitution / physiology
  • Disabled Persons / psychology
  • Environment
  • Female
  • Foot / physiopathology*
  • Humans
  • International Classification of Diseases / standards
  • International Classification of Diseases / trends
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Occupational Therapy / standards
  • Pain / diagnosis
  • Pain / physiopathology
  • Pain / psychology
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Podiatry / standards