Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct:228:107882.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107882. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study

Affiliations

Analysis of resilience strategies and ripple effect in blockchain-coordinated supply chains: An agent-based simulation study

Jacob Lohmer et al. Int J Prod Econ. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Resilience enables supply chains to reduce their proneness to disruptions and recover faster. Many existing strategies to strengthen the resilience of supply chains are facilitated by the use of digital technology. Blockchain, as one of the promising innovative technologies, enables a transparent, secure, and timely data exchange and automation via smart contracts. In this paper, we discuss the impact of blockchain technology on supply chain risk management and, in particular, on supply chain resilience. We identify potential risk-related blockchain application scenarios and examine their impact on the existing resilience strategies. We explore the impact of the most promising applications with respect to resilience by using an agent-based simulation model of a complex supply network affected by disruptions. The theoretical analysis reveals a promotion of supply chain resilience strategies, especially if smart contracts are used for risk-related collaboration. The simulation study indicates an increase in resilience if the underlying collaboration is based on time-efficient processes: The propagation of disruptions, the network recovery time, and total costs can be substantially reduced. However, depending on the duration of the disruption, negative effects can occur if process efficiency is insufficient. From our investigations, we derive insights for managers who are interested in practical implementation.

Keywords: Blockchain technology; Capacity sharing; Industry 4.0; Simulation study; Supply chain dynamics; Supply chain resilience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Potential application scenarios for blockchain implementation in SCs to increase collaboration and SC resilience.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Supply network structure.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Performance of the baseline model with respect to different disruption lengths.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Surface plot (left) and contour diagram (right) of the disruption costs saved.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Surface plot (left) and contour diagram (right) of the saved recovery time.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Surface plot (left) and contour diagram (right) of the saved number of affected partners.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Babich V., Hilary G. Distributed ledgers and operations: what operations management researchers should know about blockchain technology. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2020;22:223–240. doi: 10.1287/msom.2018.0752. - DOI
    1. Barratt M. Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J. 2004 doi: 10.1108/13598540410517566. - DOI
    1. Blossey G., Eisenhardt J., Hahn G. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2019. Blockchain technology in supply chain management: an application perspective; pp. 6885–6893. - DOI
    1. Borgonovo E., Plischke E. Sensitivity analysis: a review of recent advances. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2016;248:869–887. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.032. - DOI
    1. Bruneau M., Chang S.E., Eguchi R.T., Lee G.C., O'Rourke T.D., Reinhorn A.M., Shinozuka M., Tierney K., Wallace W.A., Von Winterfeldt D. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq. Spectra. 2003;19:733–752. doi: 10.1193/1.1623497. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources