Vindesine-mitoxantrone (VM) versus vindesine-4'-epidoxorubicin (VE) in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial

Onkologie. 1988 Feb;11(1):59-60. doi: 10.1159/000216485.

Abstract

182 patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to V (mg/m2 i.v.) and M (10 mg/m2 i.v.) or E (40 mg/m2 i.v.) every 3 weeks x 3 and then every 4 weeks; they were stratified by sites of disease (visceral, bone, or soft-tissue dominant) and by prior chemotherapy. In a preliminary analysis there is a significant difference regarding frequency of alopecia (WHO Grade 3 or 4) favoring regimen VM; gastrointestinal, hematologic and neurotoxic side effects were mild and similar for both groups. Of 114 evaluable women there is a response rate (CR + PR) of 26% and 34% for VM and VE respectively (n.s.), and there is no significant difference between the 2 groups in time to progression and survival. Both regimens are well tolerated and seem to be equally effective. The median follow-up time is too short to draw final conclusions.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Breast Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Doxorubicin / administration & dosage
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Epirubicin
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Mitoxantrone / administration & dosage
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Random Allocation
  • Vindesine / administration & dosage

Substances

  • Epirubicin
  • Doxorubicin
  • Mitoxantrone
  • Vindesine