Lack of Strategic Funding and Long-Term Job Security Threaten to Have Profound Effects on Cardiovascular Researcher Retention in Australia

Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Nov;29(11):1588-1595. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in Australia. Investment in research solutions has been demonstrated to yield health and a 9.8-fold return economic benefit. The sector, however, is severely challenged with success rates of traditional peer-reviewed funding in decline. Here, we aimed to understand the perceived challenges faced by the cardiovascular workforce in Australia prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We used an online survey distributed across Australian cardiovascular societies/councils, universities and research institutes over a period of 6 months during 2019, with 548 completed responses. Inclusion criteria included being an Australian resident or an Australian citizen who lived overseas, and a current or past student or employee in the field of cardiovascular research.

Results: The mean age of respondents was 42±13 years, 47% were male, 85% had a full-time position, and 40% were a group leader or laboratory head. Twenty-three per cent (23%) had permanent employment, and 82% of full-time workers regularly worked >40 hours/week. Sixty-eight per cent (68%) said they had previously considered leaving the cardiovascular research sector. If their position could not be funded in the next few years, a staggering 91% of respondents would leave the sector. Compared to PhD- and age-matched men, women were less likely to be a laboratory head and to feel they had a long-term career path as a cardiovascular researcher, while more women were unsure about future employment and had considered leaving the sector (all p<0.05). Greater job security (76%) and government and philanthropic investment in cardiovascular research (72%) were highlighted by responders as the main changes to current practices that would encourage them to stay.

Conclusion: Strategic solutions, such as diversification of career pathways and funding sources, and moving from a competitive to a collaborative culture, need to be a priority to decrease reliance on government funding and allow cardiovascular researchers to thrive.

Keywords: Cardiovascular; Funding; Tender equity; Workforce.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Australia
  • Betacoronavirus
  • Biomedical Research* / economics
  • Biomedical Research* / organization & administration
  • Biomedical Research* / trends
  • COVID-19
  • Cardiovascular Diseases*
  • Coronavirus Infections / epidemiology*
  • Employment / economics
  • Employment / psychology
  • Female
  • Financial Management* / methods
  • Financial Management* / organization & administration
  • Financial Management* / statistics & numerical data
  • Financing, Government
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Organizational Culture
  • Pandemics
  • Planning Techniques
  • Pneumonia, Viral / epidemiology*
  • Research Personnel* / economics
  • Research Personnel* / psychology
  • Research Personnel* / statistics & numerical data
  • Research Support as Topic* / organization & administration
  • Research Support as Topic* / trends
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Workforce* / statistics & numerical data