Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;17(4):767-772.
doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10009-8. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

Family Presence for Patients and Separated Relatives During COVID-19: Physical, Virtual, and Surrogate

Affiliations

Family Presence for Patients and Separated Relatives During COVID-19: Physical, Virtual, and Surrogate

Teck Chuan Voo et al. J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

During an outbreak or pandemic involving a novel disease such as COVID-19, infected persons may need to undergo strict medical isolation and be separated from their families for public health reasons. Such a practice raises various ethical questions, the characteristics of which are heightened by uncertainties such as mode of transmission and increasingly scarce healthcare resources. For example, under what circumstances should non-infected parents be allowed to stay with their infected children in an isolation facility? This paper will examine ethical issues with three modes of "family presence" or "being there or with" a separated family member during the current COVID-19 pandemic: physical, virtual, and surrogate. Physical visits, stays, or care by family members in isolation facilities are usually prohibited, discouraged, or limited to exceptional circumstances. Virtual presence for isolated patients is often recommended and used to enable communication. When visits are disallowed, frontline workers sometimes act as surrogate family for patients, such as performing bedside vigils for dying patients. Drawing on lessons from past outbreaks such as the 2002-2003 SARS epidemic and the recent Ebola epidemic in West Africa, we consider the ethical management of these modes of family presence and argue for the promotion of physical presence under some conditions.

Keywords: COVID-19; Communication; Epidemics; Family presence; Family separation; Medical isolation; Outbreaks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chung BPM, Wong TKS, Suen ESB, Chung JWY. SARS: Caring for patients in Hong Kong. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2005;14(4):510–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01072.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Devi S. FRONTLINE: A new treatment facility for Ebola Virus Disease. Lancet. 2018;8(392):2428. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33118-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Devlin, H. 2020. Extra 10,000 dementia deaths in England and Wales in April. The Guardian, 5 June. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/05/covid-19-causing-10000-dem.... Accessed June 08, 2020.
    1. Dugdale LS. Conclusion. In: Dugdale LS, editor. Dying in the twenty-first century: Towards a new ethical framework for the art of dying well. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2015. pp. 173–191.
    1. Gardner PJ, Moallef P. Psychological impact on SARS survivors: Critical review of the English language literature. Canadian Psychology. 2015;56(1):123–135. doi: 10.1037/a0037973. - DOI