Comparison of plasma etonogestrel concentrations sampled from the contralateral-to-implant and ipsilateral-to-implant arms of contraceptive implant users

Contraception. 2020 Dec;102(6):403-405. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

Abstract

Objective: To compare plasma etonogestrel concentrations sampled from the contralateral- versus ipsilateral-to-implant arm.

Study design: Sub-analysis of a cross-sectional study in Botswana in 33 participants who provided contralateral and ipsilateral blood samples.

Results: Plasma etonogestrel concentrations in contralateral and ipsilateral specimens were highly correlated (correlation coefficient = 0.99; p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis of agreement showed that etonogestrel levels were on average 5.9 pg/mL higher (2.1%) in ipsilateral compared to contralateral specimens (95% confidence interval: -4.1, 15.9 pg/mL).

Conclusions: We found no meaningful differences in plasma etonogestrel concentrations between samples taken from the contralateral- versus ipsilateral-to-implant arm.

Implications: Our data suggest that etonogestrel plasma concentrations are unlikely to be meaningfully different between samples drawn from the ipsilateral- versus the contralateral-to-implant arms in etonogestrel contraceptive implant users.

Keywords: Contraceptive implant; Contralateral arm; Etonogestrel; Ipsilateral arm; Pharmacokinetics.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Arm
  • Botswana
  • Contraceptive Agents, Female / administration & dosage
  • Contraceptive Agents, Female / blood*
  • Contraceptive Agents, Female / pharmacokinetics
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Desogestrel / administration & dosage
  • Desogestrel / blood*
  • Desogestrel / pharmacokinetics
  • Drug Implants / administration & dosage*
  • Drug Implants / pharmacokinetics
  • Female
  • Humans

Substances

  • Contraceptive Agents, Female
  • Drug Implants
  • etonogestrel
  • Desogestrel