Psychological impacts of "screen time" and "green time" for children and adolescents: A systematic scoping review
- PMID: 32886665
- PMCID: PMC7473739
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237725
Psychological impacts of "screen time" and "green time" for children and adolescents: A systematic scoping review
Abstract
Technological developments in recent decades have increased young people's engagement with screen-based technologies (screen time), and a reduction in young people's contact with nature (green time) has been observed concurrently. This combination of high screen time and low green time may affect mental health and well-being. The aim of this systematic scoping review was to collate evidence assessing associations between screen time, green time, and psychological outcomes (including mental health, cognitive functioning, and academic achievement) for young children (<5 years), schoolchildren (5-11 years), early adolescents (12-14 years), and older adolescents (15-18 years). Original quantitative studies were identified in four databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, Embase), resulting in 186 eligible studies. A third of included studies were undertaken in Europe and almost as many in the United States. The majority of studies were cross-sectional (62%). In general, high levels of screen time appeared to be associated with unfavourable psychological outcomes while green time appeared to be associated with favourable psychological outcomes. The ways screen time and green time were conceptualised and measured were highly heterogeneous, limiting the ability to synthesise the literature. The preponderance of cross-sectional studies with broadly similar findings, despite heterogeneous exposure measures, suggested results were not artefacts. However, additional high-quality longitudinal studies and randomised controlled trials are needed to make a compelling case for causal relationships. Different developmental stages appeared to shape which exposures and outcomes were salient. Young people from low socioeconomic backgrounds may be disproportionately affected by high screen time and low green time. Future research should distinguish between passive and interactive screen activities, and incidental versus purposive exposure to nature. Few studies considered screen time and green time together, and possible reciprocal psychological effects. However, there is preliminary evidence that green time could buffer consequences of high screen time, therefore nature may be an under-utilised public health resource for youth psychological well-being in a high-tech era.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Role of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in the Mental Health of Preschoolers, Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2019 Sep;49(9):1383-1410. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01099-5. Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 30993594
-
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well-being of torture survivors.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 11;(11):CD009317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009317.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25386846 Review.
-
Qualitative Synthesis of Young People's Experiences With Technology-Assisted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 12;21(11):e13540. doi: 10.2196/13540. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31714251 Free PMC article.
-
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005. PMID: 27819973
-
The associations between sedentary behaviour and mental health among adolescents: a systematic review.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 8;13(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0432-4. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016. PMID: 27717387 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Systematic research is needed on the potential effects of lifelong technology experience on cognition: a mini-review and recommendations.Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 16;15:1335864. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335864. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38434954 Free PMC article. Review.
-
I-MovE. An intervention to promote movement at childcare centers: Benefits for motor cognitive and socio-emotional development.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 29;19(1):e0297645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297645. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38285675 Free PMC article.
-
Macro-engagement in mHealth: Exploring user engagement beyond the screen.Digit Health. 2024 Jan 23;10:20552076231225591. doi: 10.1177/20552076231225591. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 38269371 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of screen time on behaviour and emotional problems among adolescents: A comparison study of the pre-, peak, and post-peak periods of COVID-19.Heliyon. 2023 Dec 6;10(1):e23325. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23325. eCollection 2024 Jan 15. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38163166 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between nature exposure, screen use, and parent-child relations: a scoping review protocol.Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 16;12(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02367-2. Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37974236 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bor W, Dean AJ, Najman J, Hayatbakhsh R. Are child and adolescent mental health problems increasing in the 21st century? A systematic review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2014;48(7):606–16. - PubMed
-
- Kieling C, Baker-Henningham H, Belfer M, Conti G, Ertem I, Omigbodun O, et al. Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action. The Lancet. 2011;378(9801):1515–25. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
