Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Aug 7:10:1304.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01304. eCollection 2020.

Evolution of Physical Status From Diagnosis to the End of First-Line Treatment in Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer Patients: The PROTECT-01 Cohort Study Protocol

Affiliations
Case Reports

Evolution of Physical Status From Diagnosis to the End of First-Line Treatment in Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer Patients: The PROTECT-01 Cohort Study Protocol

Joris Mallard et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Cancer cachexia and exacerbated fatigue represent two hallmarks in cancer patients, negatively impacting their exercise tolerance and ultimately their quality of life. However, the characterization of patients' physical status and exercise tolerance and, most importantly, their evolution throughout cancer treatment may represent the first step in efficiently counteracting their development with prescribed and tailored exercise training. In this context, the aim of the PROTECT-01 study will be to investigate the evolution of physical status, from diagnosis to the end of first-line treatment, of patients with one of the three most common cancers (i.e., lung, breast, and colorectal). Methods: The PROTECT-01 cohort study will include 300 patients equally divided between lung, breast and colorectal cancer. Patients will perform a series of assessments at three visits throughout the treatment: (1) between the date of diagnosis and the start of treatment, (2) 8 weeks after the start of treatment, and (3) after the completion of first-line treatment or at the 6-months mark, whichever occurs first. For each of the three visits, subjective and objective fatigue, maximal voluntary force, body composition, cachexia, physical activity level, quality of life, respiratory function, overall physical performance, and exercise tolerance will be assessed. Discussion: The present study is aimed at identifying the nature and severity of maladaptation related to exercise intolerance in the three most common cancers. Therefore, our results should contribute to the delineation of the needs of each group of patients and to the determination of the most valuable exercise interventions in order to counteract these maladaptations. This descriptive and comprehensive approach is a prerequisite in order to elaborate, through future interventional research projects, tailored exercise strategies to counteract specific symptoms that are potentially cancer type-dependent and, in fine, to improve the health and quality of life of cancer patients. Moreover, our concomitant focus on fatigue and cachexia will provide insightful information about two factors that may have substantial interaction but require further investigation. Trial registration: This prospective study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03956641), May, 2019.

Keywords: cachexia; cachexia-fatigue vicious cycle; cancer-related fatigue; exercise intolerance; muscle wasting; tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the theoretical cachexia–fatigue vicious cycle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of the PROTECT-01 study design.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustration of the neuromuscular assessments. Participant's position for finger flexor (A) and knee extensor (B) assessments and schematic representation of the protocol (C).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnes EA, Bruera E. Fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a review. Int J Gynecol Cancer Off J Int Gynecol Cancer Soc. (2002) 12:424–8. 10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200209000-00002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahlberg K, Ekman T, Gaston-Johansson F, Mock V. Assessment and management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Lancet Lond Engl. (2003) 362:640–50. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14186-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baracos VE, Martin L, Korc M, Guttridge DC, Fearon KCH. Cancer-associated cachexia. Nat Rev Dis Primer. (2018) 4:17105. 10.1038/nrdp.2017.105 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, et al. . Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. (2011) 12:489–95. 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neefjes ECW, van den Hurk RM, Blauwhoff-Buskermolen S, van der Vorst MJDL, Becker-Commissaris A, de van der Schueren MAE, et al. . Muscle mass as a target to reduce fatigue in patients with advanced cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. (2017) 8:623–9. 10.1002/jcsm.12199 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources