Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of postoperative adhesion by baseball running suture using barbed suture (BS) in laparoscopic myomectomy in comparison with sutures using an absorbable thread.
Methods: Two hundred fifteen patients who underwent second-look laparoscopy (SLL) 6 months after laparoscopic myomectomy at our hospital between 2010 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence, numbers, types, and extent of adhesions were evaluated according to the more comprehensive adhesion scoring method. Propensity score matching (PS) (1:1) between the groups was performed by using the diameter of the largest myoma, the number of enucleated myomas, and the type of adhesion barrier.
Results: Running baseball sutures and running sutures were applied to 28 and 187 patients with unidirectional BS and absorbable thread, respectively, to close the incised serosal wounds enucleating largest myomas during laparoscopic myomectomy. After PS matching for the patients, surgical findings and the incidence of postoperative wound adhesions were compared between the groups, including 22 patients each. The surgical findings were similar between the groups, except for the total surgical duration and blood loss (medians), which were significantly shorter and lower in the BS group than in the absorbable thread group (70 vs. 100 min; p = 0.01, 50 vs. 100 mL; p = 0.02). Regarding findings of SLL, no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative wound adhesions were found between the groups (BS, 4/22 [18.2%] versus absorbable thread, 8/22 [36.4%]; p = 0.31).
Conclusion: Our data indicated that the incidence of postoperative adhesion following the use of BS for wound closure in laparoscopic myomectomy was similar to that following the use of conventional suture.
Keywords: Barbed suture; Baseball running suture; Laparoscopic myomectomy; Postoperative adhesion; Second-look laparoscopy.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.