Clinical potential of hemodynamic ramp test by simultaneous echocardiography and right heart catheterization for aortic insufficiency in a patient with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device
- PMID: 32940802
- PMCID: PMC8154805
- DOI: 10.1007/s10047-020-01210-y
Clinical potential of hemodynamic ramp test by simultaneous echocardiography and right heart catheterization for aortic insufficiency in a patient with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device
Abstract
Aortic insufficiency (AI) is an important adverse event in patients with continuous-flow (CF) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. AI is often progressive, resulting in elevated 2-year morbidity and mortality. The effectiveness of echocardiographic ramp studies in patients with AI has been unclear. Here, we describe a patient with a CF-LVAD implant who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR), following assessment of AI using a hemodynamic ramp test with simultaneous echocardiography and right heart catheterization (RHC). The patient was a 21-year-old man with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocarditis, who underwent HeartWare CF-LVAD (HVAD) implantation. Heart failure persisted despite increased doses of diuretics and inotrope, as well as an increased HVAD pump rate. HVAD monitoring revealed a correlation between increased HVAD pump rate and flow at each speed step. A hemodynamic ramp test with simultaneous transthoracic echocardiography and RHC revealed a significant discrepancy between HVAD pump flow and cardiac output (CO) at each speed step; moreover, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure remained high. Therefore, the patient underwent AVR. Subsequently, his low CO symptoms disappeared and inotropes were successfully discontinued. A postoperative hemodynamic ramp test revealed that AVR had successfully closed the loop of blood flow and reduced the discrepancy between HVAD pump flow and CO, thereby increasing CO. The patient was then discharged uneventfully. In conclusion, a hemodynamic ramp test with simultaneous echocardiography and RHC was useful for the evaluation of the causal relationship between AI and low CO, and for selection of surgical treatment for AI in a patient with CF-LVAD.
Keywords: Aortic valve insufficiency; Aortic valve replacement; Cardiac output; Heart-assist devices; Pulmonary wedge pressure.
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interests related to this manuscript.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Novel Left Heart Catheterization Ramp Protocol to Guide Hemodynamic Optimization in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 19;8(4):e010232. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010232. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 30755070 Free PMC article.
-
Accurate Quantification Methods for Aortic Insufficiency Severity in Patients With LVAD: Role of Diastolic Flow Acceleration and Systolic-to-Diastolic Peak Velocity Ratio of Outflow Cannula.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun;9(6):641-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Dec 9. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 26684975
-
Surgical correction of aortic valve insufficiency after left ventricular assist device implantation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Jul 16. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23870154
-
Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices and the Aortic Valve: Interactions, Issues, and Surgical Therapy.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2020 Aug;17(4):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s11897-020-00464-0. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2020. PMID: 32488504 Review.
-
Management of aortic insufficiency in the continuous flow left ventricular assist device population.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2014 Mar;11(1):103-10. doi: 10.1007/s11897-013-0172-6. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2014. PMID: 24193452 Review.
Cited by
-
Acausal Modelling of Advanced-Stage Heart Failure and the Istanbul Heart Ventricular Assist Device Support with Patient Data.Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2023 Oct;14(5):726-741. doi: 10.1007/s13239-023-00683-1. Epub 2023 Sep 18. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2023. PMID: 37723332
-
Considerations of valvular heart disease in children with ventricular assist devices.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 22;10:1056663. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1056663. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37034354 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Aortic valve disorders and left ventricular assist devices.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 23;10:1098348. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1098348. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 36910539 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Concomitant or late aortic valve intervention and its efficacy for aortic insufficiency associated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 15;9:1029984. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1029984. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36457799 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cowger J, Rao V, Massey T, Sun B, May-Newman K, Jorde U, Estep JD. Comprehensive review and suggested strategies for the detection and management of aortic insufficiency in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.09.045. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Holley CT, Fitzpatrick M, Roy SS, Alraies MC, Cogswell R, Souslian L, Eckman P, John R. Aortic insufficiency in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support patients is common but does not impact long-term mortality. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.07.018. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sayer G, Sarswat N, Kim GH, Adatya S, Medvedofsky D, Rodgers D, Kruse E, Ota T, Jeevanandam V, Lang R, Uriel N. The hemodynamic effects of aortic insufficiency in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Card Fail. 2017;23:545–551. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.012. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
