The "Painting by Numbers Method" for education of students in crown preparation

Abstract

Introduction: No commercially available solution to improve the teaching of a crown preparation directly on typodont teeth exists at the moment. To fill this gap and support the supervisors of dental courses, a printable and inexpensive tooth was created for structured self-assessment. The aim of this study was to test this printable tooth under realistic pre-clinical situations.

Materials and methods: A two-coloured, double-layer practice tooth was developed. This tooth was consisting of a layer for a correct preparation and the crown. All printed teeth were produced with a stereolithographic printer. 35 voluntary second-year dental students in the second pre-clinical course in prosthodontics were randomly divided into two groups. All students had experience with typodont teeth and models. The first group was trained on four standard model teeth. The second group used model teeth for the first and fourth attempt and printed teeth for second and third attempt. The preparations of the students were scanned by an in-lab scanner and the surface deviations in contrast to a perfect preparation were measured. The differences between the first and fourth attempt were calculated. Benefits of the printed tooth were also evaluated by a questionnaire using German school grades completed by the students (1 = Excellent, 2 = Good, 3 = Satisfactory, 4 = Adequate, 5 = Poor, 6 = Unsatisfactory).

Results: The workflow was feasible and cost-effective regarding the production of the printed teeth. The overall rating of the printed tooth in the questionnaire was good (Ø 2.1 ± 0.22). Students reported different advantages of this method in the free text. The comparison of the preparation between the first and fourth attempt showed that there was a significant better preparation with the printed teeth. The complete preparation had median values of 0.05 mm (Group1: standard model tooth) and -0.03 mm (Group2: printed tooth) (P = .005). Divided into single surfaces, the vestibular and occlusal regions were significantly better. The vestibular surface was 0.11 mm (Group1) and -0.04 mm (Group2) (P = .018). The occlusal surface was 0.13 mm (Group1) and -0.05 mm (Group2) (P = .009).

Conclusions: The aim of this study was fulfilled. The printed tooth was tested successfully in a pre-clinical course. The feasibility of this teaching concept was confirmed by the questionnaire and the analysis of the preparation form. A significant difference to a standard model tooth was measurable. The students had the possibility to learn a correct crown preparation on a standardised two-layered tooth with included preparation. This printed tooth enabled the students to control the crown preparation directly on their own.

Keywords: CAD/CAM; accuracy and precision; additive manufacturing; clinical practice; dental restorative procedures; rapid prototyping; self-assessment.