COVID-19 Contact Tracing in Two Counties - North Carolina, June-July 2020
- PMID: 32970654
- PMCID: PMC7727500
- DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6938e3
COVID-19 Contact Tracing in Two Counties - North Carolina, June-July 2020
Abstract
Contact tracing is a strategy implemented to minimize the spread of communicable diseases (1,2). Prompt contact tracing, testing, and self-quarantine can reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (3,4). Community engagement is important to encourage participation in and cooperation with SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing (5). Substantial investments have been made to scale up contact tracing for COVID-19 in the United States. During June 1-July 12, 2020, the incidence of COVID-19 cases in North Carolina increased 183%, from seven to 19 per 100,000 persons per day* (6). To assess local COVID-19 contact tracing implementation, data from two counties in North Carolina were analyzed during a period of high incidence. Health department staff members investigated 5,514 (77%) persons with COVID-19 in Mecklenburg County and 584 (99%) in Randolph Counties. No contacts were reported for 48% of cases in Mecklenburg and for 35% in Randolph. Among contacts provided, 25% in Mecklenburg and 48% in Randolph could not be reached by telephone and were classified as nonresponsive after at least one attempt on 3 consecutive days of failed attempts. The median interval from specimen collection from the index patient to notification of identified contacts was 6 days in both counties. Despite aggressive efforts by health department staff members to perform case investigations and contact tracing, many persons with COVID-19 did not report contacts, and many contacts were not reached. These findings indicate that improved timeliness of contact tracing, community engagement, and increased use of community-wide mitigation are needed to interrupt SARS-CoV-2 transmission.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Similar articles
-
Implementation of a Pooled Surveillance Testing Program for Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections on a College Campus - Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, August 2-October 11, 2020.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 20;69(46):1743-1747. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6946e1. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020. PMID: 33211678 Free PMC article.
-
Containing COVID-19 Among 627,386 Persons in Contact With the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship Passengers Who Disembarked in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics.J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e19540. doi: 10.2196/19540. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32353827 Free PMC article.
-
Establishing prison-led contact tracing to prevent outbreaks of COVID-19 in prisons in Ireland.J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Aug 18;42(3):519-524. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa092. J Public Health (Oxf). 2020. PMID: 32567653 Free PMC article.
-
Reopening safely - Lessons from Taiwan's COVID-19 response.J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020318. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.020318. J Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 33110520 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
[Contact tracing in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. The fundamental role of Primary Health Care and Public Health].Semergen. 2020 Aug;46 Suppl 1:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 5. Semergen. 2020. PMID: 32571677 Free PMC article. Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
A Retrospective Analysis of Jordan's National COVID-19 Call Center: Operations, Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Nov 8;17:5079-5089. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S475335. eCollection 2024. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024. PMID: 39534874 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the New York City COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing program: a cascade of care analysis.BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;24(1):2356. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19838-3. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39210385 Free PMC article.
-
Representativeness of a national, probability-based panel survey of COVID-19 isolation practices-United States, 2020-2022.Front Epidemiol. 2024 Apr 26;4:1379256. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2024.1379256. eCollection 2024. Front Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 38737986 Free PMC article.
-
Looking under the lamp-post: quantifying the performance of contact tracing in the United States during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 23;24(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18012-z. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38395830 Free PMC article.
-
Time trends and modifiable factors of COVID-19 contact tracing coverage, Geneva, Switzerland, June 2020 to February 2022.Euro Surveill. 2024 Jan;29(3):2300228. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.3.2300228. Euro Surveill. 2024. PMID: 38240059 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rothenberg RB, McElroy PD, Wilce MA, Muth SQ. Contact tracing: comparing the approaches for sexually transmitted diseases and tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003;7(Suppl 3):S342–8. - PubMed
-
- Bell BP, Damon IK, Jernigan DB, et al. Overview, control strategies, and lessons learned in the CDC response to the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic. MMWR Suppl 2016;65(No. Suppl 3). - PubMed
-
- CDC. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): interim guidance on developing a COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing plan. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/contact-tracing/contact-tr...
-
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Encouraging participation and cooperation in contact tracing: lessons from survey research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2020.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous

