Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Interval Breast Cancers Compared With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers
- PMID: 32975573
- PMCID: PMC7519419
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18179
Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Interval Breast Cancers Compared With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers
Abstract
Importance: Breast cancer comprises a highly heterogeneous group of diseases. Many breast cancers, particularly the more lethal ones, may not satisfy the assumptions about biology and natural history of breast cancer necessary for screening mammography to be effective.
Objectives: To compare tumor characteristics of breast cancers diagnosed within 2 years of a normal screening mammogram (interval breast cancer [IBC]) with those of screen-detected breast cancers (SBC) and to compare breast cancer-specific mortality of IBC with SBC.
Design, setting, and participants: In this registry-based cohort study, we collected data about relevant tumor- and patient-related variables on women diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2004 and June 2010 who participated in the population-based screening program in Manitoba, Canada, and those diagnosed with breast cancer outside the screening program in the province. We performed multinomial logistic regression analysis to assess tumor and patient characteristics associated with a diagnosis of IBC compared with SBC. Competing risk analysis was performed to examine risk of death by cancer detection method.
Exposures: Breast cancer diagnosis.
Main outcomes and measures: Differences in tumor characteristics and breast cancer-specific mortality.
Results: A total of 69 025 women aged 50 to 64 years had 212 screening mammograms during the study period. There were 1687 breast cancer diagnoses (705 SBC, 206 IBC, 275 were noncompliant, and 501 were detected outside the screening program), and 225 deaths (170 breast cancer-specific deaths). Interval cancers were more likely than SBC to be of high grade and estrogen receptor negative (odds ratio [OR], 6.33; 95% CI, 3.73-10.75; P < .001; and OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 2.01-4.13; P < .001, respectively). After a median follow-up of 7 years, breast cancer-specific mortality was significantly higher for IBC compared with SBC cancers (hazard ratio [HR] 3.55; 95% CI, 2.01-6.28; P < .001), for a sojorn time of 2 years. Non-breast cancer mortality was similar between IBC and SBC (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.43-4.15).
Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, interval cancers were highly prevalent in women participating in population screening, represented a worse biology, and had a hazard for breast cancer death more than 3-fold that for SBC. Strategies beyond current mammographic screening practices are needed to reduce incidence, improve detection, and reduce deaths from these potentially lethal breast cancers.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Risk Factors and Mortality Among Women With Interval Breast Cancer vs Screen-Detected Breast Cancer.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411927. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11927. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38767918 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Mortality Among Participants of Women's Health Initiative Trials With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers vs Interval Breast Cancers.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207227. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7227. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32602908 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 5;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0859-9. Breast Cancer Res. 2017. PMID: 28583146 Free PMC article.
-
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Hologic 3D Mammography Selenia Dimensions System for Use in Breast Cancer Screening: A Single Technology Assessment [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. PMID: 29553669 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Evidence of interval cancer proportional incidence and review from mammography screening programs in Italy.Tumori. 2011 Jul-Aug;97(4):419-22. doi: 10.1177/030089161109700401. Tumori. 2011. PMID: 21989427 Review.
Cited by
-
Contrast-enhanced mammography for surveillance in women with a personal history of breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Nov;208(2):293-305. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07419-2. Epub 2024 Jul 4. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024. PMID: 38963525 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of risk assessment for breast cancer molecular subtypes.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Nov;208(1):103-110. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07404-9. Epub 2024 Jun 25. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024. PMID: 38916820 Free PMC article.
-
Lessons Learnt from Imaging Review of Interval Breast Cancers in a Single Center in the UK National Breast Screening Program.Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2024 Mar 17;34(3):522-532. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1778633. eCollection 2024 Jul. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38912252 Free PMC article.
-
Deep Learning for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: Application to a Large Representative UK Screening Cohort.Radiol Artif Intell. 2024 Jul;6(4):e230431. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230431. Radiol Artif Intell. 2024. PMID: 38775671 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors and Mortality Among Women With Interval Breast Cancer vs Screen-Detected Breast Cancer.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411927. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11927. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38767918 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
