Hemigland Cryoablation of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Intermediate-Term Followup via Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy
- PMID: 32985924
- DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001133
Hemigland Cryoablation of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Intermediate-Term Followup via Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy
Abstract
Purpose: Contemporary biopsy methods were used to determine the success rate of hemigland cryoablation as a primary treatment for prostate cancer. Previous studies, often including men at low risk, have used magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy to a variable extent. Here, we uniformly used the new diagnostic modality to study all men, each with clinically significant cancer, at baseline and at short and intermediate-term followup.
Materials and methods: In an open label trial (NCT03503643) 61 men with unilateral cancer (all clinically significant, ie Grade Group 2 or greater) underwent primary hemigland cryoablation. Subjects were 80% Caucasian, average age 69 years, prostate specific antigen 6.6 ng/ml and prostate volume 38 cc. Biopsy was performed using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prior to treatment and at the followup intervals of near-term (6 months, in 61) and intermediate-term (18 months, in 27). All utilities of fusion biopsy, ie targeting of magnetic resonance imaging visible lesions, template systematic sampling, and in followup, tracking of prior positive sites, were used throughout the study to detect clinically significant cancer, the primary end point.
Results: Following treatment 82% of men (50 of 61) had no biopsy detectable clinically significant prostate cancer at 6-month near-term followup and 82% of men (22 of 27) reaching the 18-month intermediate-term remained biopsy negative. Combination of the 3 sampling methods provided maximal cancer detection. During followup a new focus of cancer was found in the contralateral prostate in only 1 of 27 men. No adverse events above Clavien-Dindo grade 2 were encountered.
Conclusions: Hemigland cryoablation, when rigorously evaluated by all utilities of magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy, appears to eliminate clinically significant cancer in 82% of men, a success rate that endures for at least 18 months.
Keywords: biopsy; cryosurgery; prostatic neoplasm.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2020 Nov;204(5):949. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001133.02. Epub 2020 Sep 28. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32985925 No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2020 Nov;204(5):948-949. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001133.01. Epub 2020 Sep 28. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32985926 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Risk of Prostate Cancer after a Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy.J Urol. 2020 Dec;204(6):1180-1186. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001232. Epub 2020 Jul 2. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32614257
-
Hemigland Cryoablation of Localized Low, Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes at 5 Years.J Urol. 2019 Dec;202(6):1188-1198. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000456. Epub 2019 Jul 26. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31347953 Free PMC article.
-
The Long-Term Risks of Metastases in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.J Urol. 2020 Dec;204(6):1222-1228. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001313. Epub 2020 Nov 6. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 33157570
-
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR.J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1613-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.079. Epub 2016 Jun 16. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27320841 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Targeted prostate biopsy and MR-guided therapy for prostate cancer.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 May;41(5):877-88. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0681-3. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016. PMID: 26907717 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Identifying the best candidate for focal therapy: a comprehensive review.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Oct 23. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00907-y. Online ahead of print. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024. PMID: 39443815 Review.
-
Focal Minimally Invasive Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer: Comprehensive Review of Different Possible Strategies.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 13;16(4):765. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040765. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38398156 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Oncological outcomes of whole-gland cryoablation in patients with prostate cancer and high risk of lymph node invasion.Urol Ann. 2023 Jan-Mar;15(1):48-53. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_171_21. Epub 2022 Nov 8. Urol Ann. 2023. PMID: 37006224 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-reported functional outcomes and oncological control after primary focal cryotherapy for clinically significant prostate cancer: A Phase II mandatory biopsy-monitored study.Prostate. 2023 Jun;83(8):781-791. doi: 10.1002/pros.24517. Epub 2023 Mar 9. Prostate. 2023. PMID: 36895163 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cryotherapy for partial gland ablation of prostate cancer: Oncologic and safety outcomes.Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(8):9351-9362. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5692. Epub 2023 Feb 12. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 36775929 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
