Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 24;7(3):319-326.
doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2020018. eCollection 2020.

Using neuroscience techniques to understand and improve design cognition

Affiliations

Using neuroscience techniques to understand and improve design cognition

Evangelia G Chrysikou et al. AIMS Neurosci. .

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience research has traditionally focused on understanding the brain mechanisms that enable cognition by means of experimental laboratory tasks. With a budding literature, there is growing interest in the application of the related methods and findings to real-world settings. In this opinion paper we explore the potential and promise of employing current cognitive neuroscience methodologies in the field of design. We review recent evidence from preliminary studies that have employed such methods toward identifying the neural bases of design thinking and discuss their impact and limitations. Further, we highlight the importance of pairing neuroscience methods with well-established behavioral paradigms during ecologically-valid, real-world design tasks. Experimental investigations that meet these requirements can generate powerful datasets of neurocognitive measures that can offer new insights into the complex cognitive and brain systems enabling design thinking. We argue that this new knowledge can lead to the development and implementation of new techniques toward cultivating and improving design thinking in design education and professional practice.

Keywords: cognitive neuroscience; design thinking; functional magnetic resonance imaging; problem-solving and creativity; transcranial electric stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Both authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chrysikou EG, Berryhill ME, Bikson M, et al. Editorial: Revisiting the effectiveness of transcranial direct current brain stimulation for cognition: Evidence, challenges, and open questions. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:Article 448. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simon HA. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1969.
    1. Kannengiesser U, Gero JS. Design thinking, fast and slow: A framework for Kahneman's dual-system theory in design. Des Sci. 2019;5
    1. Chrysikou EG. Creative states: A cognitive neuroscience approach to understanding and improving creativity in design. In: Gero J, editor. Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. New York, NY: Springer; 2014. pp. 227–243.
    1. Gero JS, Jiang H, Williams C. Design cognition differences when using unstructured, partially structured and structured concept generation creativity techniques. Int J Des Creativity Innov. 2013;1:196–214.

LinkOut - more resources