Postoperative pain therapy with hydromorphone; comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with target-controlled infusion and standard patient-controlled analgesia: A randomised controlled trial

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Dec;37(12):1168-1175. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001360.

Abstract

Background: The challenge of managing acute postoperative pain is the well tolerated and effective administration of analgesics with a minimum of side effects. The standard therapeutic approach is patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with systemic opioids. To overcome problems of oscillating opioid concentrations, we studied patient-controlled analgesia by target-controlled infusion (TCI-PCA) as an alternative.

Objective: To compare efficacy, safety and side effects of standard PCA with TCI-PCA for postoperative pain therapy with hydromorphone.

Design: Single-blinded, randomised trial.

Setting: University Hospital, Germany from December 2013 to April 2015.

Participants: Fifty adults undergoing cardiac surgery.

Interventions: Postoperative pain therapy on the ICU was managed with intravenous (i.v.) hydromorphone and patients randomised to TCI-PCA with target plasma concentrations between 0.8 and 10 ng ml, or PCA with bolus doses of 0.2 mg. Pain was regularly assessed using the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and cardiac output were continuously monitored, and adverse events were registered throughout the study.

Main outcome measures: NRS pain ratings, hydromorphone doses, haemodynamic effects and side effects.

Results: NRS pain ratings, total doses of hydromorphone and haemodynamic data did not differ significantly between TCI-PCA and PCA. The number of bolus doses during PCA was significantly higher than the number of target increases during TCI-PCA (P = 0.006). The number of negative requests was also significantly higher during PCA than during TCI-PCA (P = 0.02). The respiratory rate on the first postoperative morning was 25 ± 6 min during TCI-PCA, compared with 19 ± 4 min during PCA (P = 0.022). Nausea occurred in 30% after TCI-PCA and 24% after PCA (P = 0.46).

Conclusion: TCI-PCA was effective and well tolerated in acute postoperative pain management after cardiac surgery. Further studies are needed to evaluate this approach in clinical practice.

Trial registration: EudraCT Number: 2013-002875-16, and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02035709.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Analgesia, Patient-Controlled*
  • Analgesics, Opioid / adverse effects
  • Germany
  • Humans
  • Hydromorphone* / adverse effects
  • Pain, Postoperative / diagnosis
  • Pain, Postoperative / drug therapy
  • Pain, Postoperative / prevention & control
  • Reference Standards

Substances

  • Analgesics, Opioid
  • Hydromorphone

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02035709