Oncologic and obstetrical outcomes after fertility-preserving retreatment in patients with recurrent atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Dec;30(12):1902-1907. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001570. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Abstract

Objective: A number of patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer have not yet given birth when they relapse after achieving complete response with initial fertility-preserving treatment. Often such patients still have a strong desire for fertility preservation; however, there are limited reports in the related literature on the efficacy of fertility-preserving retreatment in patients with relapse. This study intends to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fertility-preserving retreatment in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer after recurrence following initial fertility-preserving treatment.

Methods: Data from 110 patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer who received fertility-preserving treatment in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital (December 2005 to September 2019) were collected, and a retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical characteristics, histopathology results, and outcomes of 25 patients with recurrence.

Results: 25 patients (9 with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and 16 with endometrial cancer) received fertility-preserving retreatment. After a median treatment duration of 5 months (range 3-18), 21 patients (84%, 21/25) achieved complete response and 4 patients (16%, 4/25) had a partial response. The median follow-up time was 19.5 months (range 8-76), and a total of 8 patients (38.1%, 8/21) relapsed. The time from retreatment to complete response for endometrial cancer was significantly longer than that for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (7.5 vs 3 months; p=0.007). Among the 21 patients who achieved complete response, 12 patients had a desire for fertility, among whom 8 patients had a successful pregnancy (66.7%, 8/12) and 6 patients experienced term birth (1 patient with natural pregnancy and 5 patients with assisted reproductive technology). Six patients (50%, 6/12) delivered 6 full-term babies.

Conclusion: The response rate is high and obstetrical outcomes are favorable after fertility-preserving retreatment in patients with recurrence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer.

Keywords: endometrial hyperplasia; endometrial neoplasms; local; neoplasm recurrence; uterine cancer.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal / administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Endometrial Hyperplasia / drug therapy*
  • Endometrial Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Female
  • Fertility Preservation / methods*
  • Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone / agonists
  • Humans
  • Levonorgestrel / administration & dosage
  • Medroxyprogesterone Acetate / administration & dosage
  • Megestrol Acetate / administration & dosage
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Outcome*
  • Retreatment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
  • Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
  • Levonorgestrel
  • Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
  • Megestrol Acetate