Benefit of hospital admission for detecting serious adverse events among emergency department patients with syncope: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort
- PMID: 33051314
- PMCID: PMC7588246
- DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.191637
Benefit of hospital admission for detecting serious adverse events among emergency department patients with syncope: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort
Abstract
Background: The benefit of hospital admission after emergency department evaluation for syncope is unclear. We sought to determine the association between hospital admission and detection of serious adverse events, and whether this varied according to the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS).
Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort of patients assessed in the emergency department for syncope. We compared patients admitted to hospital and discharged patients, using propensity scores to match 1:1 for risk of a serious adverse event. The primary outcome was detection of a serious adverse event in hospital for admitted patients or within 30 days after emergency department disposition for discharged patients.
Results: We included 8183 patients, of whom 743 (9.1%) were admitted; 658/743 (88.6%) were matched. Admitted patients had higher odds of detection of a serious adverse event (odds ratio [OR] 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-7.4), nonfatal arrhythmia (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.9-8.8) and nonarrhythmic serious adverse event (OR 6.3, 95% CI 2.9-13.5). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in death (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.4-2.7) or detection of ventricular arrhythmia (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.7-6.0). Differences between admitted and discharged patients in detection of serious adverse events were greater for those with a CSRS indicating medium to high risk (p = 0.04).
Interpretation: Patients with syncope were more likely to have serious adverse events identified within 30 days if they were admitted to hospital rather than discharged from the emergency department. However, the benefit of hospital admission is low for patients at low risk of a serious adverse event.
© 2020 Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Lisa Calder is a paid employee of the Canadian Medical Protective Association. Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy received an honorarium and travel expenses for attending a 2-day focus group on syncope sponsored by Medtronic. No other competing interests were declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Rational Evaluation of the Syncope Patient: Optimizing the Emergency Department Visit.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 21;57(6):514. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060514. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 34064050 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score to predict serious adverse events after emergency department assessment of syncope.CMAJ. 2016 Sep 6;188(12):E289-E298. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151469. Epub 2016 Jul 4. CMAJ. 2016. PMID: 27378464 Free PMC article.
-
Multicenter Emergency Department Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score.JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):737-744. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0288. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32202605 Free PMC article.
-
Duration of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope.Circulation. 2019 Mar 12;139(11):1396-1406. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036088. Circulation. 2019. PMID: 30661373
-
Can I Send This Syncope Patient Home From the Emergency Department?J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;61(6):801-809. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.07.060. Epub 2021 Sep 15. J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34535304 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of a Novel Emergency Department Quality Measure to Reduce Very Low-Risk Syncope Hospitalizations.Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;79(6):509-517. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Apr 27. Ann Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 35487840 Free PMC article.
-
Syncope Time Frames for Adverse Events after Emergency Department Presentation: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 12;57(11):1235. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111235. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 34833453 Free PMC article.
-
A Rational Evaluation of the Syncope Patient: Optimizing the Emergency Department Visit.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 21;57(6):514. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060514. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 34064050 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Just the facts: how to assess a patient presenting to the emergency department with syncope.CJEM. 2021 May;23(3):286-290. doi: 10.1007/s43678-021-00095-x. Epub 2021 Mar 10. CJEM. 2021. PMID: 33689119 No abstract available.
References
-
- Shen WK, Sheldon RS, Benditt DG, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope: executive summary — a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:620–63. - PubMed
-
- Reed MJ. Approach to syncope in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2019;36:108–16. - PubMed
-
- Quinn J, McDermott D, Stiell I, et al. Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 2006;47:448–54. - PubMed
-
- Gallagher EJ. Shooting an elephant. Ann Emerg Med 2004;43:233–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical