Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Oct 13;192(41):E1198-E1205.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.191637.

Benefit of hospital admission for detecting serious adverse events among emergency department patients with syncope: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Benefit of hospital admission for detecting serious adverse events among emergency department patients with syncope: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort

Rohin J Krishnan et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: The benefit of hospital admission after emergency department evaluation for syncope is unclear. We sought to determine the association between hospital admission and detection of serious adverse events, and whether this varied according to the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS).

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort of patients assessed in the emergency department for syncope. We compared patients admitted to hospital and discharged patients, using propensity scores to match 1:1 for risk of a serious adverse event. The primary outcome was detection of a serious adverse event in hospital for admitted patients or within 30 days after emergency department disposition for discharged patients.

Results: We included 8183 patients, of whom 743 (9.1%) were admitted; 658/743 (88.6%) were matched. Admitted patients had higher odds of detection of a serious adverse event (odds ratio [OR] 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-7.4), nonfatal arrhythmia (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.9-8.8) and nonarrhythmic serious adverse event (OR 6.3, 95% CI 2.9-13.5). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in death (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.4-2.7) or detection of ventricular arrhythmia (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.7-6.0). Differences between admitted and discharged patients in detection of serious adverse events were greater for those with a CSRS indicating medium to high risk (p = 0.04).

Interpretation: Patients with syncope were more likely to have serious adverse events identified within 30 days if they were admitted to hospital rather than discharged from the emergency department. However, the benefit of hospital admission is low for patients at low risk of a serious adverse event.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Lisa Calder is a paid employee of the Canadian Medical Protective Association. Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy received an honorarium and travel expenses for attending a 2-day focus group on syncope sponsored by Medtronic. No other competing interests were declared.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flow chart showing patient selection. Note: ED = emergency department, LOC = loss of consciousness.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Predicted probability of 30-day serious adverse events based on the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) among the 8096 emergency department patients admitted to hospital or discharged. The interaction term between emergency department disposition and CSRS was significant in the multivariable logistic model (p = 0.04). Eighty-seven patients were excluded from the multivariable logistic regression analysis owing to missing predictor information.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shen WK, Sheldon RS, Benditt DG, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope: executive summary — a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:620–63. - PubMed
    1. Reed MJ. Approach to syncope in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2019;36:108–16. - PubMed
    1. Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Kwong K, Wells GA, et al. Development of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score to predict serious adverse events after emergency department assessment of syncope. CMAJ 2016;188:E289–98. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quinn J, McDermott D, Stiell I, et al. Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 2006;47:448–54. - PubMed
    1. Gallagher EJ. Shooting an elephant. Ann Emerg Med 2004;43:233–7. - PubMed

Publication types