Developing AHRQ's Feasibility Assessment Criteria for Wide-Scale Implementation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Findings
- PMID: 33051835
- PMCID: PMC7878640
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06247-6
Developing AHRQ's Feasibility Assessment Criteria for Wide-Scale Implementation of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Findings
Abstract
Background: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) Initiative identifies and prioritizes PCOR findings that could improve health care if widely implemented. To inform PCOR implementation investments, AHRQ sought to assess feasibility of widely implementing impactful PCOR findings with good strength of evidence in clinical practice.
Objective: To develop criteria to assess the feasibility of widely implementing nominated PCOR findings.
Methods: We reviewed literature and interviewed thirteen D&I experts to identify factors affecting feasibility of implementing PCOR findings. We grouped similar factors into themes. Fourteen technical expert panel (TEP) members discussed the face-validity and relative merits of the themes and additional factors, applied themes to fictional case studies, and prioritized themes for assessing feasibility. We developed criteria and guiding questions with a 3-point Likert scale. Seven D&I experts pilot-tested the criteria using sample nominations of PCOR findings. Experts represented diverse views of implementation from federal and state government agencies, research institutions, and quality improvement and advocacy organizations.
Key results: We developed a set of three essential criteria for AHRQ to assess feasibility of widely implementing PCOR findings to be widely implementable: (1) acceptability to the implementers; (2) generalizability, adaptability, and ease of implementing with fidelity; and (3) alignment with external policies and incentives. Two supplemental criteria, (1) the presence of a plan or toolkit supporting implementation, or (2) evidence supporting implementation outside the research setting, can enhance reviewers' confidence in the intervention's feasibility. Each criterion includes "guiding questions" to parse out specific components that could be more readily assessed.
Conclusions: The criteria and guiding questions are a valuable tool for informing AHRQ's investment decisions regarding implementing PCOR findings. Although developed for AHRQ's needs, the criteria may help other funders and health care organizations determine the feasibility of implementing evidence-based practices.
Keywords: criteria; evidence-based interventions; feasibility; implementation; prioritization.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Prioritizing Evidence-based Interventions for Dissemination and Implementation Investments: AHRQ's Model and Experience.Med Care. 2019 Oct;57 Suppl 10 Suppl 3(10 Suppl 3):S272-S277. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001176. Med Care. 2019. PMID: 31517799 Free PMC article.
-
Developing Recommendations for Oversight of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research—The PCOROS Study [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2020 Aug. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2020 Aug. PMID: 38556971 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Bringing Patient-Centered Outcomes Research to Life.Value Health. 2015 Jun;18(4):355-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Mar 6. Value Health. 2015. PMID: 26091588 Review.
-
Bridging the divide: building infrastructure to support community-academic partnerships and improve capacity to conduct patient-centered outcomes research.Transl Behav Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):773-782. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0487-z. Transl Behav Med. 2017. PMID: 28374212 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-centered Outcomes Research in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Sep;15(9):1005-1015. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201806-406WS. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018. PMID: 30168741 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Do colorectal cancer patients with a postoperative stoma have sexual problems? A pooling up analysis of 2566 patients.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Mar 24;38(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04372-2. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023. PMID: 36961570
-
Effect of Different Dietary Patterns on Macronutrient Composition in Human Breast Milk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients. 2023 Jan 17;15(3):485. doi: 10.3390/nu15030485. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 36771192 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Don't Get Lost in Translation: Integrating Developmental and Implementation Sciences to Accelerate Real-World Impact on Children's Development, Health, and Wellbeing.Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;10:827412. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.827412. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35493380 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. 2. New York: Oxford University Press; 2018.
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. PCOR Findings Dissemination. Available at: https://www.PCORnomination.ahrq.gov. Accessed December 23, 2019.
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Highlights of AHRQ’s Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Dissemination Investments. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/pcor/dissemination-of-pcor/ahrq-pcor-dissemination-.... Accessed March 10, 2019.
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Frequently Asked Questions about the Selection Process for AHRQ Dissemination and Implementation Initiative. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/pcor/ahrq-dissemination-and-implementation-initiati.... Accessed August 17, 2019.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
