Abstract
Emotional flexibility advancement has been found to be highly effective in clinical settings to treat, for example, depression, anxiety, and chronic pain. Developing these skills in the working context has also shown very encouraging results in public sector settings. Also, a few studies have revealed effectiveness in a private sector setting, but no studies have yet looked at the effectiveness of developing these skills amongst high-paced, high-demanding, and highly-educated knowledge workers. In this pilot training intervention study, we report evidence that emotional flexibility can be developed in this context. We conducted an experiment with treatment and control groups, with only the treatment group receiving an emotional flexibility training. Emotional flexibility improved significantly for the treatment group, whereas the improvements were minimal or negative for the control group. Furthermore, we reveal that General self-efficacy improved amongst treatment group participants (and not for control group participants), and that this is associated with emotional flexibility. Finally, we show that the improvements were higher for participants starting from a lower baseline.
MeSH terms
-
Adult
-
Education
-
Emotional Adjustment*
-
Emotional Intelligence
-
Female
-
Humans
-
Job Satisfaction
-
Male
-
Mental Health
-
Netherlands
-
Occupational Health
-
Occupational Stress / psychology
-
Pilot Projects
-
Psychometrics
-
Self Efficacy*
-
Workplace / psychology*
-
Young Adult
Grants and funding
This paper’s study was conducted as part of the International Master in Affective Neuroscience of Maastricht University and the University of Florence. The 1st author was a student of this program at the time whilst working 80% at McKinsey & Company. She received permission to conduct the study, with help of a colleague from the German office. The study was executed during the 1st author’s time outside of her time at McKinsey. There was no funding, pay or other commercial interest from the participating McKinsey organization. The 4th author, a McKinsey colleague, invited the 1st author’s participation in the study. He holds a PhD from King’s College in Immunology, is personally interested in this topic, and invests personally and professionally in improving the well-being of colleagues. This study is in no way related to work with clients of the organization. The organization where the research was performed prefers not to be mentioned in the study and hence is anonymized in the paper.