Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 15;20(1):339.
doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01467-w.

Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) accelerated development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/steatohepatitis (NASH) in MS-NASH mice fed western diet supplemented with fructose (WDF)

Affiliations

Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) accelerated development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/steatohepatitis (NASH) in MS-NASH mice fed western diet supplemented with fructose (WDF)

Guodong Zhang et al. BMC Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: Multiple murine models of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/steatohepatitis (NAFLD/NASH) have been established by using obesogenic diets and/or chemical induction. MS-NASH mouse (formally FATZO) is a spontaneously developed dysmetabolic strain that can progress from hepatosteatosis to moderate fibrosis when fed a western diet supplemented with 5% fructose (WDF). This study aimed to use carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) to accelerate and aggravate progression of NAFLD/NASH in MS-NASH mouse.

Methods: Male MS-NASH mice at 8 weeks of age were fed WDF for the entire study. Starting at 16 weeks of age, CCl4 was intraperitoneally administered twice weekly at a dose of 0.2 mL/kg for 3 weeks or 0.08 mL/kg for 8 weeks. Obeticholic acid (OCA, 30 mg/kg, QD) was administered in both MS-NASH and C57Bl/6 mice fed WDF and treated with CCl4 (0.08 mL/kg).

Results: WDF enhanced obesity and hepatosteatosis, as well as induced moderate fibrosis in MS-NASH mice similar to previous reports. Administration of CCl4 accelerated liver fibrosis with increased bridging and liver hydroxyproline contents, but had no significant impact on liver steatosis and lipid contents. High dose CCl4 caused high mortality and dramatic elevation of ALT and ASL, while low dose CCl4 resulted in a moderate elevation of ALT and AST with low mortality. Compared to C57BI/6 mice with WDF and CCl4 (0.08 mL/kg), MS-NASH mice had more prominent hepatosteatosis and fibrosis. OCA treatment significantly lowered liver triglycerides, steatosis and fibrosis in both MS-NASH and C57Bl/6 mice fed WDF with CCl4 treatment.

Conclusions: CCl4 reduced induction time and exacerbated liver fibrosis in MS-NASH mice on WDF, proving a superior NASH model with more prominent liver pathology, which has been used favorably in pharmaceutical industry for testing novel NASH therapeutics.

Keywords: FATZO; Hepatosteatosis; High fat diet; Inflammation; Liver fibrosis; NAFLD; NASH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Effects of high dose CCL4 (0.2 mL/kg) twice weekly for 3 weeks in MS-NASH mice fed Control diet (CD) or Western diet supplemented with fructose (WDF). (a) Body weight; (b) daily food and (c) caloric intake; serum (d) ALT and (e) AST before and after repeated high dose CCl4. (f) Time course of acute response of ALT and AST to a single high dose CCl4 in mice on control diet (CD). Data presented as mean ± SEM
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Histopathology in MS-NASH mice fed Control diet (CD) or Western diet supplemented with Fructose (WDF) treated high dose CCl4 (0.2 mL/kg) twice weekly for 3 weeks. Left panel: Representative images of H&E and PSR staining in animals fed (a and b) CD; and WDF treated (c, d) without or (e, f) with CCl4, respectively. Red arrows indicate fibrosis. Right panel: (g) Pathology scores of steatoses (0–3), lobular inflammation (0–3), ballooning (0–2), NAFLD Activity (0–8). (h) left: fibrosis score (0–4) and right: Percentage fibrosis area, quantitatively analyzed as total PSR positive staining area over total liver section area scanned and processed by HALO software. Data presented as mean ± SEM. # p < 0.05, ### p < 0.005 comparing with CD group; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005 comparing with WDF group by one-way ANOVA analysis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effects of low dose CCL4 (0.08 mL/kg) twice weekly for 8 weeks in MS-NASH mice fed Western diet supplemented with fructose (WDF). Top panel: (a) Body weights; serum (b) ALT and (c) AST levels before and after low dose CCL4. In-life AST and AST levels at weeks 11, 12 and 14 were measured ~ 72 h; and the terminal one at week 16 measured ~ 24 h, after CCl4 administration. Bottom Panel: Liver (d) weight; (e) cholesterol; and (f) triglycerides measured at the end of the study. Data presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, WDF vs. WDF + CCl4 group by Holm-Sidak t-test
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Histopathology in Western diet supplemented with fructose (WDF) fed MS-NASH mice treated with low dose CCL4 (0.08 mL/kg) for 8 weeks. Left panel: Representative images of H&E and PSR staining from MS-NASH mice on WDF. Yellow arrows indicate macrovesicular vacuolation steatosis; blue arrows indicate typical microvesicular ballooning within the blue square; and red arrows indicate fibrosis. (a and b) Without CCl4. (c and d) With CCl4. Bottom panel: Hepatosteatosis analysis from H&E images. (e) Semi quantification of pathology scores (0–3), lobular inflammation (0–3), ballooning (0–2), and NAFLD activity (0–8). (f) Quantitative histology analyzed as percentage of steatosis area, and cell counts of inflammation and hepatic ballooning by Reveal ImageDx software. Right panel: Fibrosis analysis from PSR images and live contents. (g) Fibrosis score by pathologist (0–4). (h) Fibrosis area by ImageDx. (i) Live hydroxyproline contents by biochemistry. Data presented as mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.005, WDF vs. WDF + CCL4 group using Holm-Sidak t-test
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Therapeutic effects of Obeticholic acid (OCA, 30 mg/kg, QD) in Western diet supplemented with fructose (WDF) fed MS-NASH or C57BI/6 mice treated low dose CCl4 (0.08 mL/kg) twice weekly for 8 weeks. Top panel: (a) Body weight; serum (b) ALT and (c) AST. Bottom panel: (d) Terminal liver weight; and liver contents of (e) triglycerides and (f) cholesterol. Data represented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, Veh. vs OCA groups by Holm-Sidak t-test
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Histopathology of Obeticholic acid (OCA, 30 mg/kg, QD) treatment on Western diet supplemented with fructose (WDF) fed MS-NASH or C57BI/6 mice under low dose CCl4 (0.08 mL/kg) twice weekly for 8 weeks. Left panel: Representative images of H&E and PSR staining in mice on WDF treated with CCl4. Yellow arrows indicate steatosis, blue arrows indicate typical microvesicular ballooning within the blue square, and red arrows indicate fibrosis. MS-NASH mice with (a and b) vehicle or (c and d) OCA. C57Bl/6 mice with (e and f) vehicle or (g and h) OCA. Bottom panel: Hepatosteatosis analysis from H&E images. (i) Semi quantification of Pathology scores (0–3), lobular inflammation (0–3), ballooning (0–2), and NAFLD activity (0–8). (j) Quantitative histology analyzed as percentage of steatosis area, and cell counts of inflammation and hepatic ballooning by Reveal ImageDx software. Right panel: Fibrosis analysis from PSR images and liver contents. (k) Fibrosis score by pathologist (0–4). (l) Fibrosis area by ImageDx. (m) Live hydroxyproline contents by biochemistry. Data represented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, Veh VS OCA group using Holm-Sidak t-test
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Comparison of survival rates in Western diet supplemented with fructose (WDF) fed MS-NASH or C57BI/6 mice under CCl4 twice weekly
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Correlation between Pathology scores and Reveal ImageDx analysis. Correlations between pathology scores for (a) steatosis; (b) lobular inflammation; (c) hepatocyte ballooning; and (d) fibrosis and Reveal ImageDx quantification by simple linear correlation with Pearson’s coefficients. All the Pearson correlation coefficient r values are statistically significant

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ratziu V, Goodman Z, Sanyal A. Current efforts and trends in the treatment of NASH. J Hepatol. 2015;62(1 Suppl):S65–S75. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73–84. doi: 10.1002/hep.28431. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Younossi ZM, Blissett D, Blissett R, Henry L, Stepanova M, Younossi Y, Racila A, Hunt S, Beckerman R. The economic and clinical burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the United States and Europe. Hepatology. 2016;64(5):1577–1586. doi: 10.1002/hep.28785. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Day CP, James OF. Steatohepatitis: a tale of two "hits"? Gastroenterology. 1998;114(4):842–845. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70599-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buzzetti E, Pinzani M, Tsochatzis EA. The multiple-hit pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) Metabolism. 2016;65(8):1038–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.12.012. - DOI - PubMed