Identification of Patients with Nontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Using Administrative Claims Data
- PMID: 33070110
- PMCID: PMC7686163
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105306
Identification of Patients with Nontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Using Administrative Claims Data
Abstract
Introduction: Nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a neurological emergency of research interest; however, unlike ischemic stroke, has not been well studied in large datasets due to the lack of an established administrative claims-based definition. We aimed to evaluate both explicit diagnosis codes and machine learning methods to create a claims-based definition for this clinical phenotype.
Methods: We examined all patients admitted to our tertiary medical center with a primary or secondary International Classification of Disease version 9 (ICD-9) or 10 (ICD-10) code for ICH in claims from any portion of the hospitalization in 2014-2015. As a gold standard, we defined the nontraumatic ICH phenotype based on manual chart review. We tested explicit definitions based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 that had been previously published in the literature as well as four machine learning classifiers including support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression with LASSO, random forest and xgboost. We report five standard measures of model performance for each approach.
Results: A total of 1830 patients with 2145 unique ICD-10 codes were included in the initial dataset, of which 437 (24%) were true positive based on manual review. The explicit ICD-10 definition performed best (Sensitivity = 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.92), Specificity = 0.83 (0.81-0.85), F-score = 0.73 (0.69-0.77)) and improves on an explicit ICD-9 definition (Sensitivity = 0.87 (0.83-0.90), Specificity = 0.77 (0.74-0.79), F-score = 0.67 (0.63-0.71). Among machine learning classifiers, SVM performed best (Sensitivity = 0.78 (0.75-0.82), Specificity = 0.84 (0.81-0.87), AUC = 0.89 (0.87-0.92), F-score = 0.66 (0.62-0.69)).
Conclusions: An explicit ICD-10 definition can be used to accurately identify patients with a nontraumatic ICH phenotype with substantially better performance than ICD-9. An explicit ICD-10 based definition is easier to implement and quantitatively not appreciably improved with the additional application of machine learning classifiers. Future research utilizing large datasets should utilize this definition to address important research gaps.
Keywords: Health services research; Intracranial hemorrhage; Quality; Stroke.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Validity of international classification of disease codes to identify ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage among individuals with associated diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jan;8(1):8-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000371. Epub 2015 Jan 13. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015. PMID: 25587093 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of volume overload hospitalizations among hemodialysis patients using administrative claims: a validation study.BMC Nephrol. 2016 Nov 11;17(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0384-6. BMC Nephrol. 2016. PMID: 27835958 Free PMC article.
-
Administrative data are not sensitive for the detection of peripheral artery disease in the community.Vasc Med. 2016 Aug;21(4):331-6. doi: 10.1177/1358863X16631041. Epub 2016 Apr 25. Vasc Med. 2016. PMID: 27114456
-
Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis.Med Care. 2014 Jun;52(6):e39-43. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268ac86. Med Care. 2014. PMID: 23001437 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of administrative data in recording sepsis: a systematic review.Crit Care. 2015 Apr 6;19(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0847-3. Crit Care. 2015. PMID: 25887596 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Tirschwell DL, Longstreth WT Jr.Validating administrative data in stroke research.Stroke.2002,-33:2465–2470 - PubMed
-
- Iezzoni LI.Using administrative diagnostic data to assess the quality of hospital care. Pitfalls and potential of icd-9-cm. Internationai journal of technology assessment in health care.1990;6:272–281 - PubMed
-
- Benesch C, Witter DM Jr., Wilder AL, Duncan PW, Samsa GP, Matchar DB.Inaccuracy of the international classification of diseases (icd-9-cm) in identifying the diagnosis of ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Neurology.1997;49:660–664 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
