"Goals of Care Conversations Don't Fit in a Box": Hospice Staff Experiences and Perceptions of Advance Care Planning Quality Measurement

doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.042

. 2021 May;61(5):917-927.

doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

"Goals of Care Conversations Don't Fit in a Box": Hospice Staff Experiences and Perceptions of Advance Care Planning Quality Measurement

Lauren J Hunt¹, Sarah B Garrett², Gabrielle Dressler³, Rebecca Sudore⁴, Christine S Ritchie⁵, Krista L Harrison²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. Electronic address: Lauren.hunt@ucsf.edu.
² Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
³ Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
⁴ Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
⁵ The Mongan Institute and the Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

PMID: 33096214
PMCID: PMC8055723
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.042

"Goals of Care Conversations Don't Fit in a Box": Hospice Staff Experiences and Perceptions of Advance Care Planning Quality Measurement

Lauren J Hunt et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 May.

. 2021 May;61(5):917-927.

doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

Authors

Lauren J Hunt¹, Sarah B Garrett², Gabrielle Dressler³, Rebecca Sudore⁴, Christine S Ritchie⁵, Krista L Harrison²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. Electronic address: Lauren.hunt@ucsf.edu.
² Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
³ Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
⁴ Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
⁵ The Mongan Institute and the Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

PMID: 33096214
PMCID: PMC8055723
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.042

Abstract

Context: With rising concerns about quality of care in hospice, federal agencies recently began mandating quality measurement in hospice, including measures of advance care planning (ACP).

Objectives: To characterize hospice providers' experiences with ACP quality measurement and their reflections on ways to improve it.

Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews of fifty-one hospice providers from various clinical backgrounds and organizational roles in four geographically diverse non-profit, community-based hospices in the U.S. Participants were queried about their experiences with and barriers to ACP quality measurement processes in their organization, opinions about the impacts of federally mandated quality measures, and ideas for improvement. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis with an interdisciplinary team, facilitated by ATLAS.ti and Excel.

Results: Four key findings of the ACP quality measurement experience for hospice staff included variation, barriers, attitudes, and recommendations for improvement. 1) Variation: Within and across organizations, participants applied a variety of processes to measure ACP quality, and exposure to and experiences with quality measurement varied based on organizational role. 2) Barriers: ACP quality measurement was impeded by limited resources, technological problems, and measurement challenges. 3) Attitudes: Participants' opinions of recently implemented federally mandated requirements for ACP quality measurement highlighted numerous downsides, unintended consequences, and few upsides. 4) Recommendations: improvements included personalizing ACP quality measures, elevating the importance of quality measurement, and streamlining processes.

Conclusion: Hospice staff take ACP quality measurement seriously, but insufficient organizational resources and regulatory bureaucracy create challenges. Efforts to enhance ACP quality measure nuance and assess outcomes are needed to improve care.

Keywords: Hospice; advance care planning; quality improvement; quality measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement: None of the authors have any conflicts to report.

Cited by

Hospice Quality, Race, and Disenrollment in Hospice Enrollees With Dementia.
Hunt LJ, Gan S, Smith AK, Aldridge MD, Boscardin WJ, Harrison KL, James JE, Lee AK, Yaffe K. Hunt LJ, et al. J Palliat Med. 2023 Aug;26(8):1100-1108. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0011. Epub 2023 Apr 3. J Palliat Med. 2023. PMID: 37010377 Free PMC article.
Natural Language Processing to Identify Advance Care Planning Documentation in a Multisite Pragmatic Clinical Trial.
Lindvall C, Deng CY, Moseley E, Agaronnik N, El-Jawahri A, Paasche-Orlow MK, Lakin JR, Volandes A, Tulsky TAIJA. Lindvall C, et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jan;63(1):e29-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.025. Epub 2021 Jul 14. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022. PMID: 34271146 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

References

1. Mor V, Teno JM. Regulating and Paying for Hospice and Palliative Care: Reflections on the Medicare Hospice Benefit. J Health Polit Policy Law 2016;41(4):697–716. - PubMed
1. National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. NHPCO Facts and Figures: Hospice Care in America, 2020. Edition. Available at https://www.nhpco.org/wp-content/uploads/NHPCO-Facts-Figures-2020-editio... Accessed September 22, 2020.
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General. 2019. Hospice Deficiencies Pose Risks to Medicare Beneficaries: Report # OEI-02–17-00020.
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General. 2019. Safeguards Must Be Strengthened To Protect Medicare Hospice Beneficiaries From Harm: Report #OEI-02–17-00021.
1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid programs: Hospice Conditions of Participation, 42 CFR § 418.54. - PubMed

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information

[1] Mor V, Teno JM. Regulating and Paying for Hospice and Palliative Care: Reflections on the Medicare Hospice Benefit. J Health Polit Policy Law 2016;41(4):697–716. - PubMed

[2] Mor V, Teno JM. Regulating and Paying for Hospice and Palliative Care: Reflections on the Medicare Hospice Benefit. J Health Polit Policy Law 2016;41(4):697–716. - PubMed

[3] National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. NHPCO Facts and Figures: Hospice Care in America, 2020. Edition. Available at https://www.nhpco.org/wp-content/uploads/NHPCO-Facts-Figures-2020-editio... Accessed September 22, 2020.

[4] National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. NHPCO Facts and Figures: Hospice Care in America, 2020. Edition. Available at https://www.nhpco.org/wp-content/uploads/NHPCO-Facts-Figures-2020-editio... Accessed September 22, 2020.

[5] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General. 2019. Hospice Deficiencies Pose Risks to Medicare Beneficaries: Report # OEI-02–17-00020.

[6] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General. 2019. Hospice Deficiencies Pose Risks to Medicare Beneficaries: Report # OEI-02–17-00020.

[7] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General. 2019. Safeguards Must Be Strengthened To Protect Medicare Hospice Beneficiaries From Harm: Report #OEI-02–17-00021.

[8] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General. 2019. Safeguards Must Be Strengthened To Protect Medicare Hospice Beneficiaries From Harm: Report #OEI-02–17-00021.

[9] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid programs: Hospice Conditions of Participation, 42 CFR § 418.54. - PubMed

[10] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid programs: Hospice Conditions of Participation, 42 CFR § 418.54. - PubMed

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

"Goals of Care Conversations Don't Fit in a Box": Hospice Staff Experiences and Perceptions of Advance Care Planning Quality Measurement

Affiliations

"Goals of Care Conversations Don't Fit in a Box": Hospice Staff Experiences and Perceptions of Advance Care Planning Quality Measurement

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources

Medical

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

Related information

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources

Medical