A mixed methods study to effectively utilize trigger tools in the ICU

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to create a trigger tool for our intensive care units (ICUs) to support our departmental quality improvement efforts.

Methods: We compiled an initial list of triggers used in an ICU setting through literature review. We used a modified Delphi method to develop a unique set of triggers. An expert panel was selected for multidisciplinary and multi-site representation from four adult medical-surgical ICUs of a Canadian city. Respondents ranked triggers on a Likert scale based on its likelihood of being associated with adverse event (sensitivity to harm), and likelihood of being associated with suboptimal ICU processes (specificity for internal recommendations).

Outcomes: Our literature search yielded 10 articles and 59 triggers. Completion of the rating process resulted in 12 items that achieved consensus. Triggers included specific clinical, hospital-acquired infection, medication related, and procedural occurrences. One additional trigger (cardiopulmonary arrest) which consistently held high scores but did not achieve multidisciplinary consensus, was also included.

Conclusions: We used the modified Delphi process to derive consensus-selected triggers to identify ICU specific adverse events with opportunity for improvement in local care. This methodology can be adopted by other centers looking to introduce trigger tools in a manner selective to their practice needs.

Keywords: Adverse events; Critical care; Patient safety.