Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 30:11:2097.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02097. eCollection 2020.

Dimension, Content, and Role of Platform Psychological Contract: Based on Online Ride-Hailing Users

Affiliations

Dimension, Content, and Role of Platform Psychological Contract: Based on Online Ride-Hailing Users

Shengxiang She et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Online sharing platforms are a new form of enterprising organizations. Their interaction with users exhibits unique characteristics. Based on the extant literature on psychological contracts and interviews, a survey, and statistical analyses of online ride-hailing users, we explore the dimension, content, and role of platform psychological contracts. The results show that the platform psychological contract includes transactional and relational dimensions. The latter dimension features social responsibility contents, which are distinct from that of a traditional enterprise. Using the scale developed herein, we further examine the effect of psychological contract breach on platform relationship quality. Evidently, both dimensions of psychological contract breach are negatively correlated with platform relationship quality. Besides, the value-added validity of relational psychological contract breach with respect to platform relationship quality is higher, suggesting the importance of the relational psychological contract.

Keywords: online car-hailing platform; psychological contract; psychological contract breach; relationship quality; value-added validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Two-dimensional structure of psychological contract.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Argyris C. (1960). Understanding Organization Behavior. Homewood: Dorsey Press, 234–251.
    1. Blancero D., Ellram L. (1997). Strategic supplier partnering:A psychological contract perspective. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log. Manag. 27 616–629. 10.1108/09600039710188684 - DOI
    1. Blau P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    1. Fournier S. (1998). Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. J. Consum. Res. 24 343–373. 10.1086/209515 - DOI
    1. Fournier S., Breazeale M., Fetscherin M. (2012). Consumer-Brand Relationships: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.

LinkOut - more resources