Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020:21:100449.
doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100449. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

Ensemble learning model for diagnosing COVID-19 from routine blood tests

Affiliations

Ensemble learning model for diagnosing COVID-19 from routine blood tests

Maryam AlJame et al. Inform Med Unlocked. 2020.

Abstract

Background and objectives: The pandemic of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has severely impacted human society with a massive death toll worldwide. There is an urgent need for early and reliable screening of COVID-19 patients to provide better and timely patient care and to combat the spread of the disease. In this context, recent studies have reported some key advantages of using routine blood tests for initial screening of COVID-19 patients. In this article, first we present a review of the emerging techniques for COVID-19 diagnosis using routine laboratory and/or clinical data. Then, we propose ERLX which is an ensemble learning model for COVID-19 diagnosis from routine blood tests.

Method: The proposed model uses three well-known diverse classifiers, extra trees, random forest and logistic regression, which have different architectures and learning characteristics at the first level, and then combines their predictions by using a second level extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier to achieve a better performance. For data preparation, the proposed methodology employs a KNNImputer algorithm to handle null values in the dataset, isolation forest (iForest) to remove outlier data, and a synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) to balance data distribution. For model interpretability, features importance are reported by using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) technique.

Results: The proposed model was trained and evaluated by using a publicly available data set from Albert Einstein Hospital in Brazil, which consisted of 5644 data samples with 559 confirmed COVID-19 cases. The ensemble model achieved outstanding performance with an overall accuracy of 99.88% [95% CI: 99.6-100], AUC of 99.38% [95% CI: 97.5-100], a sensitivity of 98.72% [95% CI: 94.6-100] and a specificity of 99.99% [95% CI: 99.99-100].

Discussion: The proposed model revealed better performance when compared against existing state-of-the-art studies (Banerjee et al., 2020; de Freitas Barbosa et al., 2020; de Moraes Batista et al., 2020; Soares et al., 2020) [3,22,56,71] for the same set of features employed by them. As compared to the best performing Bayes Net model (de Freitas Barbosa et al., 2020) [22] average accuracy of 95.159%, ERLX achieved an average accuracy of 99.94%. In comparison with AUC of 85% reported by the SVM model (de Moraes Batista et al., 2020) [56], ERLX obtained AUC of 99.77% in addition to improvements in sensitivity, and specificity. As compared with ER-COV model (Soares et al., 2020) [71] average sensitivity of 70.25% and specificity of 85.98%, ERLX model achieved sensitivity of 99.47% and specificity of 99.99%. The ERLX model obtained a considerably higher score as compared with ANN model (Banerjee et al., 2020) [3] in all performance metrics. Therefore, the model presented is robust and can be deployed for reliable early and rapid screening of COVID-19 patients.

Keywords: COVID-19; Diagnostic model; Ensemble; Machine learning; Routine blood tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The ERLX model.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the test set.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Average confusion matrix obtained from 100 replications of ERLX.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Average confusion matrix obtained from 100 replications of ERLX with [71] features.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Shap summary plot.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Altman N.S. An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Am Statistician. 1992;46:175–185.
    1. Arnold D.T., Attwood M., Barratt S., Elvers K., Morley A., McKernon J., Oates A., Donald C., Noel A., MacGowan A. Blood parameters measured on admission as predictors of outcome for covid-19; a prospective UK cohort study. 2020. medRxiv URL. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banerjee A., Ray S., Vorselaars B., Kitson J., Mamalakis M., Weeks S., Mackenzie L.S. Use of machine learning and artificial intelligence to predict sars-cov-2 infection from full blood counts in a population. Int Immunopharm. 2020 106705. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bao F.S., He Y., Liu J., Chen Y., Li Q., Zhang C.R., Han L., Zhu B., Ge Y., Chen S. 2020. Triaging moderate covid-19 and other viral pneumonias from routine blood tests. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.06546.
    1. Bao J., Li C., Zhang K., Kang H., Chen W., Gu B. Comparative analysis of laboratory indexes of severe and non-severe patients infected with covid-19. Clin Chim Acta. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.009. URL. - DOI - PMC - PubMed