Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 2;4(10):e10407.
doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10407. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Risedronate to Prevent Bone Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Study Design and Feasibility Report of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Risedronate to Prevent Bone Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Study Design and Feasibility Report of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Ashlyn A Swafford et al. JBMR Plus. .

Abstract

Mounting evidence implicates bariatric surgery as a cause of increased skeletal fragility and fracture risk. Bisphosphonate therapy reduces osteoporotic fracture risk and may be effective in minimizing bone loss associated with bariatric surgery. The main objective of this pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT; Clinical Trial No. NCT03411902) was to determine the feasibility of recruiting, treating, and following 24 older patients who had undergone sleeve gastrectomy in a 6 month RCT examining the efficacy of 150-mg once-monthly risedronate (versus placebo) in the prevention of surgical weight-loss-associated bone loss. Feasibility was defined as: (i) >30% recruitment yield, (ii) >80% retention, (iii) >80% pills taken, (iv) <20% adverse events (AEs), and (v) >80% participant satisfaction. Study recruitment occurred over 17 months. Seventy participants were referred, with 24 randomized (34% yield) to risedronate (n = 11) or placebo (n = 13). Average age was 56 ± 7 years, 83% were female (63% postmenopausal), and 21% were black. The risedronate group had a higher baseline BMI than the placebo group (48.1 ± 7.2 versus 41.9 ± 3.8 kg/m2). The 10-year fracture risk was low (6.0% major osteoporotic fracture, 0.4% hip fracture); however, three individuals (12.5%, all risedronate group) were osteopenic at baseline. Twenty-one participants returned for 6-month follow-up testing (88% retention) with all (n = 3) loss to follow-up occurring in the risedronate group. Average number of pills taken among completers was 5.9 ± 0.4 and 6.0 ± 0.0 in the risedronate and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.21), with active participants taking >80% of allotted pills. Five AEs (3.7% AE rate) were reported; one definitely related, four not related, and none serious. All participants reported high satisfaction with participation in the study. Use of bisphosphonates as a novel therapeutic to preserve bone density in patients who had undergone a sleeve gastrectomy appears feasible and well-tolerated. Knowledge gained from this pilot RCT will be used to inform the design of an appropriately powered trial.

Clinical trial registration: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03411902. Weight Loss With Risedronate for Bone Health. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Keywords: ANTIRESORPTIVES; BONE QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIALS; DXA; FRACTURE PREVENTION.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Weight Loss With Risedronate for Bone Health study flow diagram. FRAX = Fracture risk assessment tool; SG = sleeve gastrectomy; WMC = Weight Management Center.
Fig 2
Fig 2
(A) Exemplar hip volumetric BMD analysis using computed tomography X‐ray absorptiometry hip module. (B) Lumbar spine analysis of volumetric BMD using three‐dimensional spine module. (C) Cortical thickness analysis of femoral neck using the Bone Investigational Toolkit software (Mindways Software, Austin, TX, USA).
Fig 3
Fig 3
Weight Loss With Risedronate for Bone Health study CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram. SG = Sleeve gastrectomy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Estimate of bariatric surgery numbers, 2011–2018 [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2020 Apr 17]. Available from: https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers
    1. Tian Z, Fan X‐T, Li S‐Z, Zhai T, Dong J. Changes in bone metabolism after sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass: a meta‐analysis. Obes Surg. 2020. Jan;30(1):77–86. - PubMed
    1. Jaruvongvanich V, Vantanasiri K, Upala S, Ungprasert P. Changes in bone mineral density and bone metabolism after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019. Jun 18;15(8):1252–60. - PubMed
    1. Rodríguez‐Carmona Y, López‐Alavez FJ, González‐Garay AG, Solís‐Galicia C, Meléndez G, Serralde‐Zúñiga AE. Bone mineral density after bariatric surgery. A systematic review. Int J Surg. 2014;12(9):976–82. - PubMed
    1. Yu EW, Bouxsein ML, Putman MS, et al. Two‐year changes in bone density after Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015. Apr;100(4):1452–9. - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources