Developing a community of practice for quality assurance within healthcare assessment
- PMID: 33103522
- DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1830959
Developing a community of practice for quality assurance within healthcare assessment
Abstract
Background: The Australian Collaboration for Clinical Assessment in Medicine (ACCLAiM) is a voluntary assessment consortium, involving medical schools nationwide. The aims of ACCLAiM are to benchmark student clinical assessment outcomes and to provide quality assurance (QA) of exit-level Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCEs). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the ACCLAiM QA process for optimising OSCE delivery standards at the member schools using a Community of Practice (CoP) framework.
Methods: A mixed methods sequential explanatory design, involving an online questionnaire and subsequent focus group discussions, was utilised. Questionnaire responses were analysed using descriptive statistics, while thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative data.
Results: Data analysis revealed that school-specific OSCE practices had evolved based on QA feedback, as well as a collaborative sharing of expertise consistent with a CoP model. Extending beyond a QA working group for accountability and demonstration of minimum standards, participation in ACCLAiM QA processes is creating a sustainable socio-academic network focused on quality improvement.
Conclusion: Collaborative QA in clinical assessment creates opportunities for optimising standards in OSCE processes and sharing of resources for OSCE assessments. It also allows for professional development and scholarly engagement in assessment research. These benefits contribute to the existence of an emergent CoP model.
Keywords: OSCE; Quality assurance; clinical assessment; community of practice; quality improvement.
Similar articles
-
Changes to objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) at Australian medical schools in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.Med Teach. 2022 Apr;44(4):418-424. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1998404. Epub 2021 Nov 11. Med Teach. 2022. PMID: 34762549
-
A snapshot of current Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) practice at Australian medical schools.Med Teach. 2019 Apr;41(4):441-447. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1487547. Epub 2018 Sep 27. Med Teach. 2019. PMID: 30261798
-
The value of best-practice guidelines for OSCEs in a postgraduate program in an Australian remote area setting.Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(3):2469. Epub 2014 Jul 27. Rural Remote Health. 2014. PMID: 25064043
-
Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Psychiatry Education: A Review of Its Role in Competency-Based Assessment.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;988:159-180. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56246-9_13. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017. PMID: 28971397 Review.
-
Changing an existing OSCE to a teaching tool: the making of a teaching OSCE.Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):932. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00036. Acad Med. 2002. PMID: 12228103 Review.
Cited by
-
Virtual OSCE Delivery and Quality Assurance During a Pandemic: Implications for the Future.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 4;9:844884. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.844884. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35445035 Free PMC article.
-
Has the OSCE Met Its Final Demise? Rebalancing Clinical Assessment Approaches in the Peri-Pandemic World.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 21;9:825502. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.825502. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35265639 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare professionals' longitudinal perceptions of group phenomena as determinants of self-assessed learning in organizational communities of practice.BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 3;22(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03137-9. BMC Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 35114973 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
