Objective: Personal Health Budget has been provided to consumers with severe mental illness within a policy shift toward a person-tailored mental healthcare treatment based on individual unmet needs. Evidence of beneficial effects of Personal Health Budget is still scarce. The aim of this study was to provide preliminary data on clinical and social benefits of adding Personal Health Budget to a standard pharmacotherapy in patients with severe mental illness across a 24-month follow-up period.
Methods: Participants (n = 137) were individuals with severe mental illness, aged 18-50 years, recruited in one of the adult mental health services of the Parma Department of Mental Health. They completed the Global Assessment of Functioning scale, the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. This age range was chosen to limit Personal Health Budget interventions to adults with a non-prolonged illness duration. Friedman's test for repeated measure was used to assess the longitudinal stability of functioning and clinical parameters. A linear regression analysis was also performed.
Results: A significant decrease in all Global Assessment of Functioning scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores along the 24 months of follow-up was observed. Regression analysis results specifically showed a relevant association between a Personal Health Budget multiaxial intervention and the longitudinal reduction in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale 'Negative Symptoms' and Health of the Nation Outcome Scale 'Social Problems' subscores.
Conclusion: Our findings support the useful implementation of a Health of the Nation Outcome Scale approach for severe mental illness patients within the Italian mental health service network.
Keywords: Personal Health Budget; community care; mental health services; rehabilitation; severe mental illness.