Comparison of midazolam and diazepam to supplement total intravenous anaesthesia with ketamine for endoscopy

Can J Anaesth. 1987 Sep;34(5):466-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03014351.

Abstract

Fifty patients undergoing endoscopy (laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy, mediastinoscopy) were anaesthetised in a double-blind prospective trial using total intravenous anaesthesia. Half of the patients were anaesthetised with an infusion of a solution of 250 mg ketamine and 12.5 mg midazolam. The other patients received an infusion of a solution of 250 mg ketamine and 20 mg diazepam. In addition, both groups were given increments of 50-100 micrograms of fentanyl. The immediate awakening time (t1) was not significantly different between groups, but the patients who had received midazolam-ketamine, had a significantly shorter time to more complete recovery (t2), a significantly lower frequency of emergence reactions and were more satisfied with the anaesthetic than the patients who had received diazepam-ketamine. There was no difference between groups with respect to intraoperative heart rate and blood pressure. No awareness during anaesthesia was reported.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Anesthesia, Intravenous*
  • Blood Pressure / drug effects
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Diazepam / administration & dosage*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Endoscopy*
  • Female
  • Heart Rate / drug effects
  • Humans
  • Ketamine*
  • Male
  • Midazolam / administration & dosage*
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Random Allocation

Substances

  • Ketamine
  • Diazepam
  • Midazolam