Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 30:10:520330.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.520330. eCollection 2020.

Clinical Significance of Glucose to Lymphocyte Ratio (GLR) as a Prognostic Marker for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

Affiliations

Clinical Significance of Glucose to Lymphocyte Ratio (GLR) as a Prognostic Marker for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

Ailing Zhong et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Glucose metabolism and systemic inflammation have been associated with cancer aggressiveness and patient prognosis in various malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of pretreatment GLR(glucose to lymphocyte ratio) and systemic immune inflammation in patients with pancreatic cancer. We studied 360 patients with pathologically diagnosed pancreatic adenocarcinoma that was clinically unresectable. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics and laboratory investigations including fasting blood glucose, platelet count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA199), and follow-up data were collected for further analysis. The patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 238) and a validation cohort (n = 122). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic value of GLR, systemic immune-inflammation markers, and tumor biomarkers. A nomogram model was developed based on the identified prognostic factors, and we used the C-index to evaluate the accuracy of the Cox regression model prediction. Multivariate analysis revealed that GLR [hazard ratio (HR): 2.597; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.728-3.904)] and CA199 (HR: 2.484; 95% CI: 1.295-4.765) are independent predictors of poor overall survival in the training cohort and were incorporated into the nomogram for OS as independent factors. Moreover, the C-index analyses demonstrated that the C-indexes in the training cohort and the validation cohort were 0.674 and 0.671, respectively. The nomogram model predicts overall survival relatively accurately. We found that the baseline GLR is an independent prognostic factor for patients with pancreatic cancer, and the proposed nomogram can be used as an effective tool for predicting the outcomes of prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Keywords: glucose to lymphocyte ratio; nomogram; pancreatic cancer; prognosis; tumor biomarker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient inclusion flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between markers and overall survival (OS) in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer in the training cohort (N = 238). Kaplan-Meier curves for OS of all cases in the training cohort. The median level was selected as the cut-off between the low and high levels. The P-value was determined using the log-rank test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Nomogram for predicting median survival time and survival probability of inoperable pancreatic cancer patients. To use the nomogram, an individual patient's value is located on each variable axis, and a line is drawn upward to determine the number of points received for each variable. The sum of these numbers is located on the Total Points axis, and a line is drawn downward to the survival axes to determine the estimated median survival time and survival probability.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The calibration curve for predicting survival probability of inoperable pancreatic cancer patients in the training cohort and validation cohort.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Hazard ratios (HRs) of prognostic markers for OS in different patient subgroups in the training cohort. HRs were calculated by comparing patients with low values to those with high values. HRs with a 1.0 line indicate a meaningless outcome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Falasca M, Kim M, Casari I. Pancreatic cancer: current research and future directions. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2016) 1865:123–32. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2016.01.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. (2019) 69:7–34. 10.3322/caac.21551 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adamska A, Domenichini A, Falasca M. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: current and evolving therapies. Int J Mol Sci. (2017) 18:1338. 10.3390/ijms18071338 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, Figer A, Hecht JR, Gallinger S, et al. . Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the national cancer institute of Canada clinical trials group. J Clin Oncol. (2007) 25:1960–6. 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.9525 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, et al. . FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. (2011) 364:1817–25. 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources