The Perspective of Key Stakeholders on the Impact of Reaccreditation in a Large National Mental Health Institute

Abstract

Background: Obtaining and maintaining accreditation is an important component of high-quality mental health care services. However, research is lacking, and explanations for quantitative observations surrounding the sustainability of improvements are unfounded in qualitative data. The aim of this study was to explore how accreditation, specifically that provided by Joint Commission International, affects service quality at the Institute of Mental Health in Singapore to advance our understanding of its effects and the durability of improvements.

Methods: Researchers conducted 21 qualitative semistructured interviews with key informants to understand how obtaining reaccreditation was affecting the institute. The data were analyzed thematically to produce an understanding of the various ways in which accreditation improved care quality.

Results: Accreditation contributed to the improvement of care via several mechanisms. Although participants universally endorsed the positive impact of accreditation on safety, it was harder to pinpoint specific outcomes that improved because of it. Accreditation, however, had unintended consequences: Unnecessary processes arising from overinterpretation of standards led to several staff behaviors that might ultimately compromise the sustainability of new processes.

Conclusion: Although accreditation drives improvement via clear mechanisms, policy makers must be aware of unintended consequences. Organizations struggling with accreditation must clearly communicate the rationale for the implementation of new processes linked to reaccreditation. With a clear purpose, changes may be more sustainable.