Background: Variations in the clinical presentation of the unilateral cleft lip resulted in numerous surgical repair techniques used around the world. No universally accepted method exists to evaluate aesthetic surgical results. The purpose of this study is to use the Hubli lip grading system, developed by Smile Train, to evaluate the aesthetic results of unilateral cleft lip repairs based on the surgical technique used.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of unilateral cleft lip repair operations performed by Smile Train surgeons throughout Africa, Americas, Asia Pacific, and Europe and Middle East between 2014 and 2018. Using the Hubli lip grading criteria, factoring in cleft severity, acceptable outcomes were identified and compared with the surgical technique used.
Results: Eight thousand forty-one unilateral cleft lip repairs were reviewed. The majority utilized the rotational advancement technique (n = 5541, 68.9%) with a statistically significant percentage of acceptable outcomes (92.1%), followed by an acceptance rate of 91.9% with variations of the z-plasty technique, 90.5% with the straight-line repair and its variations, and 88.4% using "other" techniques (P < 0.05). The rotational advancement had the highest acceptable outcomes for complete cleft lips (94.7%, P < 0.0001), associated alveolar clefting (94.2%, P < 0.05), and concomitant clefting of the hard and/or soft palate (94.3%, P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Regardless of surgical technique used, Smile Train surgeons maintain high rates of successful surgical outcomes. Results of our study will help complement and support existing medical infrastructure and training systems Smile Train employs for surgeons working with comprehensive cleft care teams around the world.