Using a Respectful Approach to Child-centred Healthcare (ReACH) in a paediatric clinical trial: A feasibility study

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 9;15(11):e0241764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241764. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Background: There is a growing momentum in paediatric ethics to develop respectful research and healthcare protocols. We developed, tested and refined our 'Respectful Approach to Child-centred Healthcare' (ReACH), to underpin respectful participant interactions in a clinical trial.

Objective: To determine whether a ReACH-based approach is acceptable to children and parents, and effective in obtaining compliance with common healthcare assessments in a clinical trial of healthy 4-6-year-old children.

Methods: ReACH-based child assessments were evaluated at two baseline clinics and one post-intervention, using mixed methods. Children (n = 49; 46.9% female; mean age = 5.24±0.88 years at baseline) and their parents provided independent evaluation, via customised 5-point Likert scales and qualitative feedback. A dedicated child researcher evaluated adherence to the study ReACH principles.

Results: Children achieved compliance rates of 95% for body composition (BodPod) assessments; 89% for blood pressure measurements, and 92% (baseline) and 87% (post-intervention) for blood draws. Adherence to ReACH principles during clinic visits was positively associated with child compliance, significantly for baseline BodPod (p = 0.002) and blood test (p = 0.009) clinics. Satisfaction with BodPod protocols was positively associated with compliance, for children at baseline (p = 0.029) and for parents post-intervention (p <0.001). Parents rated the study itself very highly, with 91.7% satisfied at baseline and 100% post-intervention. Qualitative feedback reflected an enjoyable study experience for both parents and children.

Conclusions: Adherence to our emerging ReACH approach was associated with high child compliance rates for common healthcare assessments, although no causality can be inferred at this preliminary stage of development. Participants expressed satisfaction with all aspects of the study. Our use of child-centred methods throughout a research intervention appears feasible and acceptable to children and their parents.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Child Day Care Centers / statistics & numerical data
  • Child, Preschool
  • Delivery of Health Care / methods*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Health Status
  • Humans
  • Male

Grants and funding

The Milky Way Study clinical trial received financial support from the Telethon Kids Institute and from the Telethon Perth Children’s Hospital Research Fund, Department of Health, and Channel 7 Telethon Trust, Western Australia. A. Nicholl and K. E. Deering were each supported in their PhD studies by an Australian Government Higher Degree by Research scholarship. A. Nicholl additionally received a PhD top-up scholarship from the Children’s Diabetes Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia. The authors received no specific funding from the Milky Way Study clinical trial, or elsewhere, for this study data analysis, manuscript preparation, revision or submission.