Psychotherapy During COVID-19: How the Clinical Practice of Italian Psychotherapists Changed During the Pandemic

Tommaso Boldrini; Arianna Schiano Lomoriello; Franco Del Corno; Vittorio Lingiardi; Silvia Salcuni

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591170

Psychotherapy During COVID-19: How the Clinical Practice of Italian Psychotherapists Changed During the Pandemic

Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 21:11:591170. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591170. eCollection 2020.

Authors

Tommaso Boldrini¹, Arianna Schiano Lomoriello^{1

2}, Franco Del Corno³, Vittorio Lingiardi⁴, Silvia Salcuni¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
² Department of Cognitive System, Denmark Technical University (DTU), Copenhagen, Denmark.
³ Association for Research in Clinical Psychology (ARP), Milan, Italy.
⁴ Department of Dynamic and Clinic Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

Aims: Italy was one of the first countries to be significantly affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, determining a unique scenario for Italian psychotherapists to consider changing the modality in which they deliver treatment. The present study aimed at studying which factors related to psychotherapists and their clinical practice had a major role in predicting two main outcomes: (1) the rate of interrupted treatments during lockdown and (2) psychotherapists' satisfaction with the telepsychotherapy modality. Methods: An online survey was administered to licensed psychotherapists (n = 306), who worked mainly as private practitioners, between April 5 and May 10, 2020 (i.e., the peak of the pandemic in Italy). Results: Psychotherapists reported that 42.1% (SD = 28.9) of their treatments had been interrupted, suggesting that Italy faced an important undersupply of psychotherapy during the lockdown. Using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) model selection, we identified three predictors of the rate of interrupted treatments: (1) psychotherapists' lack of experience with telepsychotherapy prior to the lockdown, (2) their theoretical orientation (with cognitive behavioral psychotherapists reporting a higher rate of interrupted treatments), and (3) patients' lack of privacy at home, as reported to the psychotherapists. Furthermore, we found four predictors of psychotherapists' satisfaction with the telepsychotherapy modality: (1) the rate of interrupted treatments, (2) psychotherapists' previous experience with telepsychotherapy, (3) their beliefs about the compatibility of telepsychotherapy with their theoretical orientation, and (4) their use of a video-conferencing modality, rather than telephone. Conclusion: The following recommendations can help policy makers, professional associations, and practitioners in promoting the continuity of psychotherapy treatments during the COVID-19 outbreak and in future emergencies: (i) disseminating training programs for practitioners on telepsychotherapy, (ii) supporting patients to pragmatically access a private space at home, (iii) encouraging practitioners to use video-conferencing (instead of telephone) to deliver remote therapy, and (iv) increasing the acceptance of telepsychotherapy among both clinicians and the general public.

Keywords: COVID-19; psychotherapy; public health; remote psychotherapy; telepsychotherapy.