Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities
- PMID: 33199655
- DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106645
Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities
Abstract
This paper spotlights ways in which sexual capacities relate to central human capabilities, such as the ability to generate a personally meaningful story of one's life; be physically, mentally and emotionally healthy; experience bodily integrity; affiliate and bond with others; feel and express a range of human emotions; and choose a plan of life. It sets forth a dignity-based argument for affording older people access to sex robots as part of reasonable efforts to support their central human capabilities at a floor level. The argument develops stepwise: (1) first, I dispel ageism and negative stereotypes about later-life sexuality, showing their deep historical roots in medicine and science; (2) second, I set forth a positive argument, grounded in capability accounts of justice, for deploying sex robots for older people with disabilities; (3) finally, after responding to objections, I conclude that sex robots are a reasonable way to support later-life sexuality for persons with disabilities. While often depicted as a product for younger, able-bodied people, this paper is a bid for reimagining sex robots as a product for older, disabled people.
Keywords: aged; disabilities; ethics; sexuality/gender; technology/risk assessment.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Commentary on Jecker.J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):36. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106957. Epub 2020 Nov 24. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33234547 No abstract available.
-
Sex robot fantasies.J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):33-34. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106932. Epub 2020 Nov 27. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33246995 No abstract available.
-
Are sex robots enough?J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):35. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106928. Epub 2020 Dec 3. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33273070 No abstract available.
-
Considering sex robots for older adults with cognitive impairments.J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):37-38. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106927. Epub 2020 Dec 7. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33288646 No abstract available.
-
Robots and sexual ethics.J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):1-2. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107153. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33443098 No abstract available.
-
Sex robots for older adults with disabilities: reply to critics.J Med Ethics. 2021 Feb;47(2):113. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107148. Epub 2021 Jan 17. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33455942 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Sex robots for older adults with disabilities: reply to critics.J Med Ethics. 2021 Feb;47(2):113. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107148. Epub 2021 Jan 17. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33455942 No abstract available.
-
Are sex robots enough?J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):35. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106928. Epub 2020 Dec 3. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33273070 No abstract available.
-
Anent the theoretical justification of a sex doula program.Theor Med Bioeth. 2023 Apr;44(2):125-140. doi: 10.1007/s11017-023-09612-8. Epub 2023 Feb 24. Theor Med Bioeth. 2023. PMID: 36826740 Free PMC article.
-
Access to Sexual Rights for People Living with Disabilities: Assumptions, Evidence, and Policy Outcomes.Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Nov;52(8):3201-3255. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02372-x. Epub 2022 Jul 26. Arch Sex Behav. 2023. PMID: 35881252 Review.
-
Adolescent sexuality and disability.Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2002 Nov;13(4):857-73. doi: 10.1016/s1047-9651(02)00045-1. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2002. PMID: 12465564 Review.
Cited by
-
Non-empirical methods for ethics research on digital technologies in medicine, health care and public health: a systematic journal review.Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Dec;27(4):513-528. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10222-x. Epub 2024 Aug 9. Med Health Care Philos. 2024. PMID: 39120780 Free PMC article.
-
Sex robots and virtual reality sex: advantages and challenges.Int J Impot Res. 2024 Nov;36(7):684-687. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00766-6. Epub 2023 Sep 22. Int J Impot Res. 2024. PMID: 37740025 Review. No abstract available.
-
The Potential Use of Sex Robots in Adults with Autistic Spectrum Disorders: A Theoretical Framework.Brain Sci. 2023 Jun 15;13(6):954. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060954. Brain Sci. 2023. PMID: 37371432 Free PMC article.
-
Critical Success Factors for Successful Implementation of Healthcare 4.0: A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;20(5):4669. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054669. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36901679 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Investigating the differences between females perceive same-gender and heterogender sex robots regarding adoption and intentions.Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 19;13:922108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922108. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36059759 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical