Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;47(1):26-32.
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106645. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities

Affiliations

Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities

Nancy S Jecker. J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

This paper spotlights ways in which sexual capacities relate to central human capabilities, such as the ability to generate a personally meaningful story of one's life; be physically, mentally and emotionally healthy; experience bodily integrity; affiliate and bond with others; feel and express a range of human emotions; and choose a plan of life. It sets forth a dignity-based argument for affording older people access to sex robots as part of reasonable efforts to support their central human capabilities at a floor level. The argument develops stepwise: (1) first, I dispel ageism and negative stereotypes about later-life sexuality, showing their deep historical roots in medicine and science; (2) second, I set forth a positive argument, grounded in capability accounts of justice, for deploying sex robots for older people with disabilities; (3) finally, after responding to objections, I conclude that sex robots are a reasonable way to support later-life sexuality for persons with disabilities. While often depicted as a product for younger, able-bodied people, this paper is a bid for reimagining sex robots as a product for older, disabled people.

Keywords: aged; disabilities; ethics; sexuality/gender; technology/risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

  • Commentary on Jecker.
    Sorell T. Sorell T. J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):36. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106957. Epub 2020 Nov 24. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33234547 No abstract available.
  • Sex robot fantasies.
    Sparrow R. Sparrow R. J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):33-34. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106932. Epub 2020 Nov 27. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33246995 No abstract available.
  • Are sex robots enough?
    Boni-Saenz AA. Boni-Saenz AA. J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):35. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106928. Epub 2020 Dec 3. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33273070 No abstract available.
  • Considering sex robots for older adults with cognitive impairments.
    Bianchi A. Bianchi A. J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):37-38. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106927. Epub 2020 Dec 7. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33288646 No abstract available.
  • Robots and sexual ethics.
    Earp BD, Grunt-Mejer K. Earp BD, et al. J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):1-2. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107153. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33443098 No abstract available.
  • Sex robots for older adults with disabilities: reply to critics.
    Jecker NS. Jecker NS. J Med Ethics. 2021 Feb;47(2):113. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107148. Epub 2021 Jan 17. J Med Ethics. 2021. PMID: 33455942 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources