Using a cartoon questionnaire to improve consent process in children: a randomized controlled survey
- PMID: 33203966
- DOI: 10.1038/s41390-020-01227-2
Using a cartoon questionnaire to improve consent process in children: a randomized controlled survey
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an audio and animated cartoon questionnaire (AACQ) at improving consent process in child for biospecimen donation.
Methods: A multi-center randomized and controlled survey was performed at two pediatric hospitals in China from 2019 to 2020. Children aged from 7 to 18 years in the pediatric surgery wards were invited to investigate the participants' willingness and attitudes for donating biospecimens. A total of 264 children, including 119 in the AACQ group and 145 in the TQ group, and 67 parents of children were analyzed. A separate knowledge test was acquired in the questionnaires.
Results: Our findings showed that the response rate of the AACQ group (89.85%) was significantly higher than that of the TQ group (68.44%; p < 0.001). AACQ can improve the child's understanding, increase children's engagement in biospecimen donation, reduced the differences in selected characteristics affecting children understanding, and enhanced their risk awareness of donating biospecimens. We also found that increasing pain and privacy disclosure were the most popular concern among children for the refusal to donate biospecimens.
Conclusions: AACQ is an effective and standardized tool of content delivery to children from the surgical wards. Children who fully understood of biospecimen donation are suggested to participate in the consent signing.
Impact: Using audio and animated cartoon questionnaire is a more effective and standardized tool of content delivery to children. This study expanded the use of an animated cartoon to a children's survey. Audio and animated cartoon questionnaire (AACQ) can improve the child's understanding, increase children's engagement in biospecimen donation compared to text questionnaire (TQ) group, and enhanced their risk awareness of donating biospecimens. More AACQ should be used with children in the future to effectively deliver content to children and improve children's participation in the survey.
© 2020. International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Factors That Affect Chinese Parents' Willingness to Donate Children's Biospecimens in Pediatric Research.Biopreserv Biobank. 2018 Dec;16(6):402-410. doi: 10.1089/bio.2018.0051. Epub 2018 Oct 26. Biopreserv Biobank. 2018. PMID: 30362817
-
Parental attitudes and willingness to donate children's biospecimens for congenital heart disease research: a cross-sectional study in Shanghai, China.BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e022290. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022290. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30337311 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of factors influencing the willingness to donate biospecimens among guardians of children with cancer and adult cancer patients.Cancer Med. 2022 Mar;11(6):1524-1534. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4544. Epub 2022 Feb 3. Cancer Med. 2022. PMID: 35112506 Free PMC article.
-
Informed consent instead of assent is appropriate in children from the age of twelve: Policy implications of new findings on children's competence to consent to clinical research.BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 9;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0067-z. BMC Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 26553304 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD003717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. PMID: 18254029 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the Lower Urinary Tract Syndrome with a Telemedicine Application: An Exploration of the Electronic Audiovisual Prostate Symptom Score.Front Surg. 2022 Apr 28;9:848923. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.848923. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36003282 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Joly, Y., Dyke, S. O. M., Knoppers, B. M. & Pastinen, T. Are data sharing and privacy protection mutually exclusive? Cell 167, 1150–1154 (2016). - DOI
-
- Hobbs, A., Starkbaum, J., Gottweis, U., Wichmann, H. E. & Gottweis, H. The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies. Public Health Genomics 15, 272–284 (2012). - DOI
-
- Pullman, D., Etchegary, H., Gallagher, K., Hodgkinson, K. & Street, C. Personal privacy, public benefits, and biobanks: a conjoint analysis of policy priorities and public perceptions. Genet. Med. 14, 229–235 (2012). - DOI
-
- Sanderson, S. C. et al. Public attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobank research: a large multi-site experimental survey in the US. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 100, 414–427 (2017). - DOI
-
- Yang, Y., Qin, Y., Chi, H., Li, A. H. & Li, Y. Management of data sharing of human genetic resources and its enlightenment to China. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 41, 396–401 (2019).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
