Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jun;44(6):1139-1149.
doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01464-6. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

Risk of developing metabolic syndrome after gestational diabetes mellitus - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk of developing metabolic syndrome after gestational diabetes mellitus - a systematic review and meta-analysis

A Tranidou et al. J Endocrinol Invest. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to quantitatively synthesize the current evidence regarding the risk of developing metabolic syndrome (MetS) in women with a personal history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), without pre-existing diabetes, compared with those without a history of GDM.

Methods: Four electronic databases [MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO] were searched for relevant literature until July 29th 2020. Cochran's Q test was applied for the assessment of heterogeneity. The random-effects model was applied by calculating the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study. Publication bias was estimated with Egger's linear regression test.

Results: The results from 23 studies (10,230 pregnant women; 5169 cases, 5061 controls), indicated that women with a history of GDM had a higher risk of developing MetS compared with those without such a history (OR 3.45; 95% CI 2.80-4.25, p < 0.0001). This risk remained higher, independently of maternal age and ethnicity (although the risk was not as high in Asians; OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.27-3.52). The risk of developing MetS was even higher in studies where women with GDM had increased body mass index (BMI) compared with the controls (OR 4.14; 95% CI 3.18-5.38).

Conclusions: The risk for developing MetS following delivery is higher in women with a history of GDM compared with women without such a history. Timely recognition and appropriate intervention are critical to halt progression to MetS and its associated morbidity.

Keywords: GDM; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Glucose; Hyperglycemia; Meta-analysis; Metabolic syndrome; Pregnancy; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Diabetes Association (2015) 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 38(Supplement 1):S8–S16
    1. Behboudi-Gandevani S, Amiri M, Yarandi RB, Tehrani FR (2019) The impact of diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes on its prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr 11(1):11–11 - PubMed - PMC
    1. ID Federation (2019) IDF diabetes atlas, 9th edn. ID Federation
    1. Brody SC, Harris R, Lohr K (2003) Screening for gestational diabetes: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Obstet Gynecol 101(2):380–392 - PubMed
    1. Cypryk K, Pertyńska-Marczewska M, Szymczak W, Zawodniak-Szałapska M, Wilczyński J, Lewiński A (2005) Overweight and obesity as common risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), perinatal macrosomy in offspring and type-2 diabetes in mothers. Prz Lek 62(1):38–41

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources