Background: In the biological response to biomaterials, the implant shell plays a key role in immune and inflammatory reactions. We hypothesized that the capsules formed around nanotextured implants exhibit an immunohistochemical behavior different to those formed around polyurethane implants.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate through immunohistochemistry markers the capsules formed around nanotextured and polyurethane implants.
Methods: Sixty albino female Wistar rats were divided into 2 groups (nanotextured and polyurethane), with 30 animals in each group. A mini silicone implant was inserted on the back of the animals. After a predetermined period, the animals were killed, and the capsules formed around the implants were studied. The capsules in the 30-, 60-, and 90-day subgroups were analyzed via immunohistochemistry to detect markers for fibroblast α smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34), and CD68, via picrosirius staining to determine the density of type I and III collagen fibers and via hematoxylin and eosin staining to assess capsule thickness. A Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the groups, and a Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the subgroups.
Results: Lower α-SMA, TGF-β, CD34 and CD68 immunoexpression was observed in the nanotextured 30- and 60-day subgroups than in the corresponding polyurethane subgroups. In the 90-day subgroup, more pronounced α-SMA and CD34 immunoexpression was observed in the nanotextured group; however, TGF-β and CD68 immunoexpression remained lower. The nanotextured implants showed reduced capsular thickness and greater formation of type I collagen in all the analyzed subgroups.
Conclusions: Nanotextured implants led to reduced immune and inflammatory reactions compared with polyurethane implants according to all analyzed variables.
© 2020 The Aesthetic Society. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.