Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 20;12(11):3564.
doi: 10.3390/nu12113564.

Meeting of Minds around Food Addiction: Insights from Addiction Medicine, Nutrition, Psychology, and Neurosciences

Affiliations
Review

Meeting of Minds around Food Addiction: Insights from Addiction Medicine, Nutrition, Psychology, and Neurosciences

Aymery Constant et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

This review, focused on food addiction (FA), considers opinions from specialists with different expertise in addiction medicine, nutrition, health psychology, and behavioral neurosciences. The concept of FA is a recurring issue in the clinical description of abnormal eating. Even though some tools have been developed to diagnose FA, such as the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) questionnaire, the FA concept is not recognized as an eating disorder (ED) so far and is even not mentioned in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel of Mental Disorders version 5 (DSM-5) or the International Classification of Disease (ICD-11). Its triggering mechanisms and relationships with other substance use disorders (SUD) need to be further explored. Food addiction (FA) is frequent in the overweight or obese population, but it remains unclear whether it could articulate with obesity-related comorbidities. As there is currently no validated therapy against FA in obese patients, FA is often underdiagnosed and untreated, so that FA may partly explain failure of obesity treatment, addiction transfer, and weight regain after obesity surgery. Future studies should assess whether a dedicated management of FA is associated with better outcomes, especially after obesity surgery. For prevention and treatment purposes, it is necessary to promote a comprehensive psychological approach to FA. Understanding the developmental process of FA and identifying precociously some high-risk profiles can be achieved via the exploration of the environmental, emotional, and cognitive components of eating, as well as their relationships with emotion management, some personality traits, and internalized weight stigma. Under the light of behavioral neurosciences and neuroimaging, FA reveals a specific brain phenotype that is characterized by anomalies in the reward and inhibitory control processes. These anomalies are likely to disrupt the emotional, cognitive, and attentional spheres, but further research is needed to disentangle their complex relationship and overlap with obesity and other forms of SUD. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment must rely on a multidisciplinary coherence to adapt existing strategies to FA management and to provide social and emotional support to these patients suffering from highly stigmatized medical conditions, namely overweight and addiction. Multi-level interventions could combine motivational interviews, cognitive behavioral therapies, and self-help groups, while benefiting from modern exploratory and interventional tools to target specific neurocognitive processes.

Keywords: behavior; cognition; craving; motivation; obesity; reward circuit; therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Food addiction as a causative or contributive factor for overweight and obesity. A personalized and optimized psychobehavioral therapy in patients with food addiction may help in preventing overweight and obesity, reducing their related comorbidities and related costs, and improving outcomes of obesity surgery. Dotted lines indicate connections for which published data are lacking or insufficient.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Neurocognitive functions and brain areas that are impacted by food addiction and for which people who meet the YFAS criteria for food addiction have different brain activity, metabolism, or functional connectivity compared to normal subjects. Please refer to Table 2 for details on results and imaging modalities used. Brain schematic representations were collected from Servier Medical Art (Suresnes, France; http://www.servier.fr).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Randolph T.G. The descriptive features of food addiction; addictive eating and drinking. Q. J. Stud. Alcohol. 1956;17:198–224. doi: 10.15288/qjsa.1956.17.198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Markus C.R., Rogers P.J., Brouns F., Schepers R. Eating dependence and weight gain; no human evidence for a ‘sugar-addiction’ model of overweight. Appetite. 2017;114:64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rogers P.J., Smit H.J. Food craving and food “addiction”: A critical review of the evidence from a biopsychosocial perspective. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2000;66:3–14. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(00)00197-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gordon E.L., Ariel-Donges A.H., Bauman V., Merlo L.J. What Is the Evidence for “Food Addiction?” A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2018;10:477. doi: 10.3390/nu10040477. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schulte E.M., Avena N.M., Gearhardt A.N. Which foods may be addictive? The roles of processing, fat content, and glycemic load. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0117959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117959. - DOI - PMC - PubMed