Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 11;113(3):525-533.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa316.

Circulating carotenoids and breast cancer among high-risk individuals

Affiliations

Circulating carotenoids and breast cancer among high-risk individuals

Cheng Peng et al. Am J Clin Nutr. .

Abstract

Background: Carotenoids represent 1 of few modifiable factors to reduce breast cancer risk. Elucidation of interactions between circulating carotenoids and genetic predispositions or mammographic density (MD) may help inform more effective primary preventive strategies in high-risk populations.

Objectives: We tested whether women at high risk for breast cancer due to genetic predispositions or high MD would experience meaningful and greater risk reduction from higher circulating levels of carotenoids in a nested case-control study in the Nurses' Health Studies (NHS and NHSII).

Methods: This study included 1919 cases and 1695 controls in a nested case-control study in the NHS and NHSII. We assessed both multiplicative and additive interactions. RR reductions and 95% CIs were calculated using unconditional logistic regressions, adjusting for matching factors and breast cancer risk factors. Absolute risk reductions (ARR) were calculated based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results incidence rates.

Results: We showed that compared with women at low genetic risk or low MD, those with higher genetic risk scores or high MD had greater ARRs for breast cancer as circulating carotenoid levels increase (additive P-interaction = 0.05). Among women with a high polygenic risk score, those in the highest quartile of circulating carotenoids had a significant ARR (28.6%; 95% CI, 14.8-42.1%) compared to those in the lowest quartile of carotenoids. For women with a high percentage MD (≥50%), circulating carotenoids were associated with a 37.1% ARR (95% CI, 21.7-52.1%) when comparing the highest to the lowest quartiles of circulating carotenoids.

Conclusions: The inverse associations between circulating carotenoids and breast cancer risk appeared to be more pronounced in high-risk women, as defined by germline genetic makeup or MD.

Keywords: absolute risk; breast cancer; carotenoids; genetic risk; mammography density.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Multivariable RRs (95% CI) of overall breast cancer by (A) quartiles of carotenoids and PRS (case n = 1919; control n = 1695) and (B) quartiles of carotenoids and predetermined cutoff of MD (case n = 1439; control n = 1344). Models adjusted for age at blood draw (continuous), BMI at blood draw (continuous), family history (yes vs. no), history of benign breast disease (yes vs. no), alcohol consumption (non-drinker, <5 g/day, 5–10 g/day, 10–15 g/day, or 15+ g/day), age at first birth/parity (nulliparous; 1 or 2 children and <25 years old; 1 or 2 children and 25–29 years old; 1 or 2 children 30+ years old; 3+ children and <25 years old; or 3+ children and 25+ years old), menopausal status (premenopausal, postmenopausal, or unknown), age at menarche (11 years or younger, 12 years, 13 years, or 14+ years), and smoking status (never, former, or current). Multiplicative interaction was tested with a likelihood ratio test through comparing 2 generalized linear models with and without the interaction term. Additive interaction was assessed with relative excess risk due to interaction, which measured the difference between the joint RR and the separate contributions by the 2 dichotomized exposures. Standard error for additive interaction was estimated with the delta method as described by Hosmer and Lemeshow (26). Abbreviations: MD, mammographic density; PRS, polygenic risk score.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. - PubMed
    1. Eliassen AH, Hendrickson SJ, Brinton LA, Buring JE, Campos H, Dai Q, Dorgan JF, Franke AA, Gao YT, Goodman MTet al. . Circulating carotenoids and risk of breast cancer: Pooled analysis of eight prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(24):1905–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang X, Spiegelman D, Baglietto L, Bernstein L, Boggs DA, van den Brandt PA, Buring JE, Gapstur SM, Giles GG, Giovannucci Eet al. . Carotenoid intakes and risk of breast cancer defined by estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status: A pooled analysis of 18 prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(3):713–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Larsson SC, Bergkvist L, Wolk A. Dietary carotenoids and risk of hormone receptor-defined breast cancer in a prospective cohort of Swedish women. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(6):1079–85. - PubMed
    1. Cui Y, Shikany JM, Liu S, Shagufta Y, Rohan TE. Selected antioxidants and risk of hormone receptor-defined invasive breast cancers among postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(4):1009–18. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types