New global guidelines on sedentary behaviour and health for adults: broadening the behavioural targets
- PMID: 33239026
- PMCID: PMC7691115
- DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-01044-0
New global guidelines on sedentary behaviour and health for adults: broadening the behavioural targets
Abstract
Background: In 2018, the World Health Organisation (WHO) commenced a program of work to update the 2010 Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health, for the first-time providing population-based guidelines on sedentary behaviour. This paper briefly summarizes and highlights the scientific evidence behind the new sedentary behaviour guidelines for all adults and discusses its strengths and limitations, including evidence gaps/research needs and potential implications for public health practice.
Methods: An overview of the scope and methods used to update the evidence is provided, along with quality assessment and grading methods for the eligible new systematic reviews. The literature search update was conducted for WHO by an external team and reviewers used the AMSTAR 2 (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) tool for critical appraisal of the systematic reviews under consideration for inclusion. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method was used to rate the certainty (i.e. very low to high) of the evidence.
Results: The updated systematic review identified 22 new reviews published from 2017 up to August 2019, 14 of which were incorporated into the final evidence profiles. Overall, there was moderate certainty evidence that higher amounts of sedentary behaviour increase the risk for all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer mortality, as well as incidence of CVD, cancer, and type 2 diabetes. However, evidence was deemed insufficient at present to set quantified (time-based) recommendations for sedentary time. Moderate certainty evidence also showed that associations between sedentary behaviour and all-cause, CVD and cancer mortality vary by level of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), which underpinned additional guidance around MVPA in the context of high sedentary time. Finally, there was insufficient or low-certainty systematic review evidence on the type or domain of sedentary behaviour, or the frequency and/or duration of bouts or breaks in sedentary behaviour, to make specific recommendations for the health outcomes examined.
Conclusions: The WHO 2020 guidelines are based on the latest evidence on sedentary behaviour and health, along with interactions between sedentary behaviour and MVPA, and support implementing public health programmes and policies aimed at increasing MVPA and limiting sedentary behaviour. Important evidence gaps and research opportunities are identified.
Keywords: Cancer; Cardiovascular; Chronic disease; Exercise; Global health; Guidelines; Health promotion; Physical activity; Public health; Sedentary; Type 2 diabetes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5-17 years: summary of the evidence.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 26;17(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020. PMID: 33239009 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Global Public Health Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior for People Living With Chronic Conditions: A Call to Action.J Phys Act Health. 2021 Jan 1;18(1):76-85. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2020-0525. Epub 2020 Dec 4. J Phys Act Health. 2021. PMID: 33276323 Review.
-
Sedentary Behavior and Health: Update from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jun;51(6):1227-1241. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001935. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019. PMID: 31095080 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral Counseling to Promote a Healthful Diet and Physical Activity for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Adults Without Known Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Jul. Report No.: 15-05222-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Jul. Report No.: 15-05222-EF-1. PMID: 29364620 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour.Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955. Br J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 33239350 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Prospective Associations of Accelerometer-Measured Machine-Learned Sedentary Behavior With Death Among Older Women: The OPACH Study.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 5;13(5):e031156. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031156. Epub 2024 Feb 27. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38410939 Free PMC article.
-
The Annual Rhythms in Sleep, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity of Australian Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.Ann Behav Med. 2024 Mar 12;58(4):286-295. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae007. Ann Behav Med. 2024. PMID: 38394346 Free PMC article.
-
CHAP-Adult: A Reliable and Valid Algorithm to Classify Sitting and Measure Sitting Patterns Using Data From Hip-Worn Accelerometers in Adults Aged 35.J Meas Phys Behav. 2022 Dec;5(4):215-223. doi: 10.1123/jmpb.2021-0062. Epub 2022 Sep 21. J Meas Phys Behav. 2022. PMID: 38260182 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of physical activity and sedentary time on depression, anxiety and well-being: a bidirectional Mendelian randomisation study.BMC Med. 2023 Dec 18;21(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03211-z. BMC Med. 2023. PMID: 38110912 Free PMC article.
-
A mixed method evaluation of a theory based intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in contact centres- the stand up for health stepped wedge feasibility study.PLoS One. 2023 Dec 15;18(12):e0293602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293602. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38100490 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Bauman AE, Petersen CB, Blond K, Rangul V, Hardy LL. The descriptive epidemiology of sedentary behaviour. In: Leitzmann MF, Jochem C, Schmid D, editors. Sedentary behaviour epidemiology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 73–106.
-
- Ekelund U, Brown WJ, Steene-Johannessen J, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al. Do the associations of sedentary behaviour with cardiovascular disease mortality and cancer mortality differ by physical activity level? A systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis of data from 850 060 participants. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(14):886–894. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098963. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1302–1310. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ekelund U, Tarp J, Steene-Johannessen J, Hansen BH, Jefferis B, Fagerland MW, et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4570. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
