Repeated measurement of implicit self-associations in clinical depression: Psychometric, neural, and computational properties

J Abnorm Psychol. 2021 Feb;130(2):152-165. doi: 10.1037/abn0000651. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

Abstract

Implicit self-associations are theorized to be rigidly and excessively negative in affective disorders like depression. Such information processing patterns may be useful as an approach to parsing heterogeneous etiologies, substrates, and treatment outcomes within the broad syndrome of depression. However, there is a lack of sufficient data on the psychometric, neural, and computational substrates of Implicit Association Test (IAT) performance in patient populations. In a treatment-seeking, clinically depressed sample (n = 122), we administered five variants of the IAT-a dominant paradigm used in hundreds of studies of implicit cognition to date-at two repeated sessions (outside and inside a functional MRI scanner). We examined reliability, clinical correlates, and neural and computational substrates of IAT performance. IAT scores showed adequate (.67-.81) split-half reliability and convergent validity with one another and with relevant explicit symptom measures. Test-retest correlations (in vs. outside the functional MRI scanner) were present but modest (.15-.55). In depressed patients, on average, negative implicit self-representations appeared to be weaker or less efficiently processed relative to positive self-representations; elicited greater recruitment of frontoparietal task network regions; and, according to computational modeling of trial-by-trial data, were driven primarily by differential efficiency of information accumulation for negative and positive attributes. Greater degree of discrepancy between implicit and explicit self-worth predicted depression severity. Overall, these IATs show potential utility in understanding heterogeneous substrates of depression but leave substantial room for improvement. The observed clinical, neural, and computational correlates of implicit self-associations offer novel insights into a simple computer-administered task in a clinical population and point toward heterogeneous depression mechanisms and treatment targets. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03237286.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cognition
  • Depressive Disorder, Major / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Psychometrics*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self Report*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03237286