Barriers to Implementing Cardiovascular Risk Calculation in Primary Care: Alignment With the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
- PMID: 33279368
- PMCID: PMC8638790
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.07.027
Barriers to Implementing Cardiovascular Risk Calculation in Primary Care: Alignment With the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular disease risk calculators can inform and guide preventive strategies and treatment decisions by clinicians and patients. However, their uptake in primary care has been slow despite the recommendation in national cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines. Identifying the barriers to the implementation of cardiovascular disease risk calculators is essential for promoting their adoption.
Methods: The authors qualitatively analyzed structured physician educator notes written during an outreach education intervention with 44 small- and medium-sized primary care clinics that participated in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality‒funded EvidenceNOW Healthy Hearts Northwest trial. The authors coded barriers to the implementation of cardiovascular disease risk calculation and aligned them to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Results: The authors identified 13 barriers from the physician educators' notes. The majority (n=8, 62%) mapped to the framework's Inner Setting domain. The 5 most commonly noted barriers were (1) time constraints to use a calculator (N=23 clinics), (2) limitations to accessing a calculator or the necessary information to use a calculator (N=22 clinics), (3) no or minimal buy-in from clinicians or staff to use a calculator (N=19 clinics), (4) reported patient fear of side effects from statin medications or patient dislike of taking medications per the guidelines (N=17 clinics), and (5) lack of documented clinic workflow for using a calculator (N=16 clinics).
Conclusions: To improve the uptake of cardiovascular disease risk calculation in primary care, future cardiovascular disease prevention and implementation research should consider tailoring interventions to the common barriers to implementing cardiovascular disease risk calculation.
Trial registration: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02839382.
Copyright © 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Tailoring Implementation Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculator Adoption in Primary Care Clinics.J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Dec 23;35(6):1143-1155. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.210449R1. Epub 2022 Dec 2. J Am Board Fam Med. 2022. PMID: 36460353 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative study exploring the barriers and facilitators of implementing a cardiovascular disease risk reducing intervention for people with severe mental illness into primary care contexts across England: the 'PRIMROSE' trial.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 15;20(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05643-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32799925 Free PMC article.
-
A randomized matched-pairs study of feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of systems consultation: a novel implementation strategy for adopting clinical guidelines for Opioid prescribing in primary care.Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0713-1. Implement Sci. 2018. PMID: 29370813 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Checks using QRISK®2 and JBS3 risk calculators: the RICO qualitative and quantitative study.Health Technol Assess. 2021 Aug;25(50):1-124. doi: 10.3310/hta25500. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 34427556
-
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review.Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 31;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01142-y. Implement Sci. 2021. PMID: 34332601 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Optimizing Cardiovascular Health: A Comprehensive Review of Risk Assessment Strategies for Primary Prevention.Cureus. 2024 Aug 6;16(8):e66341. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66341. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39246950 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Patients Classified as High-Risk between International Cardiovascular Disease Primary Prevention Guidelines.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 26;13(15):4379. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154379. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39124648 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the Novel Web-Based Application HUMTELEMED for a Comprehensive Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk Based on the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines.J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 16;13(8):2295. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082295. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38673568 Free PMC article.
-
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk among Ghanaians: A comparison of the risk assessment tools.Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Apr 18;18:100670. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100670. eCollection 2024 Jun. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38655384 Free PMC article.
-
FRAX predicts cardiovascular risk in women undergoing osteoporosis screening: the Manitoba bone mineral density registry.J Bone Miner Res. 2024 Mar 4;39(1):30-38. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjad010. J Bone Miner Res. 2024. PMID: 38630880
References
-
- Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, Xu J, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2015;229(229):1–8. doi: - PubMed
-
- Goff DC Jr., Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S49–73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Goff DC Jr., Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2935–2959. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
