Can the detection dog alert on COVID-19 positive persons by sniffing axillary sweat samples? A proof-of-concept study
- PMID: 33301539
- PMCID: PMC7728218
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243122
Can the detection dog alert on COVID-19 positive persons by sniffing axillary sweat samples? A proof-of-concept study
Abstract
The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to evaluate if trained dogs could discriminate between sweat samples from symptomatic COVID-19 positive individuals (SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive) and those from asymptomatic COVID-19 negative individuals. The study was conducted at 2 sites (Paris, France, and Beirut, Lebanon), followed the same training and testing protocols, and involved six detection dogs (three explosive detection dogs, one search and rescue dog, and two colon cancer detection dogs). A total of 177 individuals were recruited for the study (95 symptomatic COVID-19 positive and 82 asymptomatic COVID-19 negative individuals) from five hospitals, and one underarm sweat sample per individual was collected. The dog training sessions lasted between one and three weeks. Once trained, the dog had to mark the COVID-19 positive sample randomly placed behind one of three or four olfactory cones (the other cones contained at least one COVID-19 negative sample and between zero and two mocks). During the testing session, a COVID-19 positive sample could be used up to a maximum of three times for one dog. The dog and its handler were both blinded to the COVID-positive sample location. The success rate per dog (i.e., the number of correct indications divided by the number of trials) ranged from 76% to 100%. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the estimated success rate was most of the time higher than the success rate obtained by chance after removing the number of mocks from calculations. These results provide some evidence that detection dogs may be able to discriminate between sweat samples from symptomatic COVID-19 individuals and those from asymptomatic COVID-19 negative individuals. However, due to the limitations of this proof-of-concept study (including using some COVID-19 samples more than once and potential confounding biases), these results must be confirmed in validation studies.
Conflict of interest statement
DiagNose, Cynopro Detection Dogs, ICTS Europe, Biodesiv SAS, and Mario K9 provided support in the form of salaries for authors. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
COVID-19 sniffer dog experimental training: Which protocol and which implications for reliable sidentification?J Med Virol. 2021 Oct;93(10):5924-5930. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27147. Epub 2021 Jun 26. J Med Virol. 2021. PMID: 34152634 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying SARS-COV-2 infected patients through canine olfactive detection on axillary sweat samples; study of observed sensitivities and specificities within a group of trained dogs.PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0262631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262631. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35157716 Free PMC article.
-
Canine olfactory detection and its relevance for the medical identification of patients with COVID-19.Infect Dis (Lond). 2024 Oct;56(10):880-886. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2024.2363887. Epub 2024 Jun 18. Infect Dis (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38889329
-
Toward the use of medical scent detection dogs for COVID-19 screening.J Osteopath Med. 2021 Feb 1;121(2):141-148. doi: 10.1515/jom-2020-0222. J Osteopath Med. 2021. PMID: 33567089 Review.
-
COVID-19 detection by dogs: from physiology to field application-a review article.Postgrad Med J. 2022 Mar;98(1157):212-218. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-139410. Epub 2021 Feb 11. Postgrad Med J. 2022. PMID: 33574179 Review.
Cited by
-
Dogs' ability to detect an inflammatory immune response in cattle via olfaction.Front Vet Sci. 2024 Apr 9;11:1393289. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1393289. eCollection 2024. Front Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 38655536 Free PMC article.
-
Scent Detection Threshold of Trained Dogs to Eucalyptus Hydrolat.Animals (Basel). 2024 Apr 3;14(7):1083. doi: 10.3390/ani14071083. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38612322 Free PMC article.
-
Can scent-detection dogs detect the stress associated with trauma cue exposure in people with trauma histories? A proof-of-concept study.Front Allergy. 2024 Mar 28;5:1352840. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1352840. eCollection 2024. Front Allergy. 2024. PMID: 38606088 Free PMC article.
-
Unraveling the potential of breath and sweat VOC capture devices for human disease detection: a systematic-like review of canine olfaction and GC-MS analysis.Front Chem. 2023 Nov 1;11:1282450. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1282450. eCollection 2023. Front Chem. 2023. PMID: 38025078 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sniffing out safety: canine detection and identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection from armpit sweat.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 19;10:1185779. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1185779. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37822474 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hasell J. Testing early, testing late: four countries’ approaches to COVID-19 testing compared. 2020; https://ourworldindata.org/covid-testing-us-uk-korea-italy.
-
- Bijland LR, Bomers MK, Smulders YM. Smelling the diagnosis: a review on the use of scent in diagnosing disease. Neth J Med 2013,71:300–307. - PubMed
-
- Edwards TL, Brown CM, Schoon A, Cox C, Poling A. Animal olfactory detection of human diseases: Guidelines and systematic review. J Vet Behav 2017,20:59–73.
-
- Pirrone F, Albertini M. Olfactory detection of cancer by trained sniffer dogs: A systematic review of the literature. J Vet Behav 2017,19:105–117.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
