Comparison of Use of Health Care Services and Spending for Unauthorized Immigrants vs Authorized Immigrants or US Citizens Using a Machine Learning Model

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029230. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29230.

Abstract

Importance: Knowledge about use of health care services (health care utilization) and expenditures among unauthorized immigrant populations is uncertain because of limitations in ascertaining legal status in population data.

Objective: To examine health care utilization and expenditures that are attributable to unauthorized and authorized immigrants vs US-born individuals.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used the data on documentation status from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey (LAFANS) to develop a random forest classifier machine learning model. K-fold cross-validation was used to test model performance. The LAFANS is a randomized, multilevel, in-person survey of households residing in Los Angeles County, California, consisting of 2 waves. Wave 1 began in April 2000 and ended in January 2002, and wave 2 began in August 2006 and ended in December 2008. The machine learning model was then applied to a nationally representative database, the 2016-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), to predict health care expenditures and utilization among unauthorized and authorized immigrants and US-born individuals. A generalized linear model analyzed health care expenditures. Logistic regression modeling estimated dichotomous use of emergency department (ED), inpatient, outpatient, and office-based physician visits by immigrant groups with adjusting for confounding factors. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2019, to October 14, 2020.

Exposures: Self-reported immigration status (US-born, authorized, and unauthorized status).

Main outcomes and measures: Annual health care expenditures per capita and use of ED, outpatient, inpatient, and office-based physician care.

Results: Of 47 199 MEPS respondents with nonmissing data, 35 079 (74.3%) were US born, 10 816 (22.9%) were authorized immigrants, and 1304 (2.8%) were unauthorized immigrants (51.7% female; mean age, 47.6 [95% CI, 47.4-47.8] years). Compared with authorized immigrants and US-born individuals, unauthorized immigrants were more likely to be aged 18 to 44 years (80.8%), Latino (96.3%), and Spanish speaking (95.2%) and to have less than 12 years of education (53.7%). Half of unauthorized immigrants (47.1%) were uninsured compared with 15.9% of authorized immigrants and 6.0% of US-born individuals. Mean annual health care expenditures per person were $1629 (95% CI, $1330-$1928) for unauthorized immigrants, $3795 (95% CI, $3555-$4035) for authorized immigrants, and $6088 (95% CI, $5935-$6242) for US-born individuals.

Conclusions and relevance: Contrary to much political discourse in the US, this cross-sectional study found no evidence that unauthorized immigrants are a substantial economic burden on safety net facilities such as EDs. This study illustrates the value of machine learning in the study of unauthorized immigrants using large-scale, secondary databases.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Data Collection / methods*
  • Databases, Factual / statistics & numerical data
  • Emigrants and Immigrants* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Emigrants and Immigrants* / statistics & numerical data
  • Family Characteristics
  • Female
  • Health Expenditures / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Los Angeles / ethnology
  • Machine Learning*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minority Health / economics
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care* / ethnology
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care* / statistics & numerical data
  • Population Groups / statistics & numerical data
  • Undocumented Immigrants / statistics & numerical data*