Expert systems: frames, rules or logic for species identification?

Comput Appl Biosci. 1987 Mar;3(1):1-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/3.1.1.

Abstract

The role of expert systems in species identification, with particular reference to the problems posed by damaged specimens and inexperienced taxonomists, is discussed. Of the three main types of expert systems available, the frame-based system is shown to provide the most appropriate model for a taxonomic expert system rather than a logic- or rule-based system. The advantages of an expert system over other computer-aided methods of identification are considered. A rule-based system requires the original knowledge (species descriptions) to be structured into rules, whereas a frame-based system can store the generic and specific descriptions in a series of frames. The frames fall into a hierarchy which closely resembles the taxonomic hierarchy, and down which information can be inherited. Two aspects of frame-based systems considered are the use of probabilities in identification, and the optimum structure of the knowledge base. The conventional use of probabilities is to provide an indication of the correctness of the result. However, in some studies involving the identification of many specimens, the speed of identification may be increased (with a reduction in accuracy) if identifications are made to a predetermined probability level. Although frames allow accurate representation of the taxonomic hierarchy, a semantic net, incorporating structures of the organism and/or details of the habitat may result in a more efficient expert system.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Classification / methods*
  • Expert Systems*
  • Information Systems
  • Logic
  • Species Specificity