Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 11;99(50):e23298.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023298.

Media and scientific communication about the COVID-19 pandemic and the repercussions on the population's mental health: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Isac Davidson Santiago Fernandes Pimenta  1 , Ádala Nayana de Sousa Mata  2 , Liliane Pereira Braga  2 , Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de Medeiros  3 , Kesley Pablo Morais de Azevedo  1 , Isaac Newton Machado Bezerra  4 , Victor Hugo de Oliveira Segundo  1 , Ana Clara de França Nunes  1 , Gilberto Martins Santos  5 , Suely Grosseman  6 , Ismael Martínez Nicolás  7 , Grasiela Piuvezam  8
Affiliations
Free PMC article

Media and scientific communication about the COVID-19 pandemic and the repercussions on the population's mental health: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Isac Davidson Santiago Fernandes Pimenta et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Good communication strategies are essential in times of crisis, such as the coronavirus pandemic. The dissemination of inaccurate information and the need for social isolation to control coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have shown a negative impact on the population, causing damage to mental health, with the appearance or worsening of symptoms of stress, fear, anxiety, and depression. Thus, the systematic review study is intended to gather evidence on the impact of information about COVID-19 on the mental health of the population.

Methods: This systematic review protocol is conducted using the guidelines of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The review aims to include published studies that address the exposure of the general population to information about COVID-19, through observational and experimental studies, which consider the following outcomes: fear, stress, anxiety, and depression. Thus, a comprehensive research strategy will be conducted in the following databases: PubMed / Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Science Direct, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Two independent reviewers will perform all procedures, such as study selection, data collection, and methodological evaluation. Disagreements will be forwarded to a third reviewer. RevMan 5.3 software will be used for data analysis.

Results: This systematic review will provide evidence of the influence of access to and consumption of media and scientific information about COVID-19 on the mental health of the population. It will consider information about the characterization of the study and the population studied, clinical and epidemiological information on mental health, and data on access to and consumption of media and scientific information.

Discussion: The results should inform about the consequences of communication about the new coronavirus on the emergence or worsening of psychological and psychiatric symptoms, allowing to develop strategies to achieve effective communication of information to promote the mental health of the population.

Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42020182918.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Smailhodzic E, Hooijsma W, Boonstra A, et al. Social media use in healthcare: a systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:442.1–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Brien M, Moore K, McNicholas F. Social media spread during covid-19: the pros and cons of likes and shares. Ir Med J 2020;11:52.1–3. - PubMed
    1. Zhang L, Li H, Chen K. Effective risk communication for public health emergency: reflection on the COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) outbreak in Wuhan, China. Healthcare (Basel) 2020;8:64.1–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mian A, Khan S. Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation. BMC Med 2020;18:89.1–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pan American Health Organization. The infodemic and misinformation in the fight against COVID-19. Pan American Health Organization; 2020:1-5. Available at: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/52052/Factsheet-infodemic.... Accessed October 5, 2020.